Universal Kernel

Deuxième partie · Doubles viesChapitre 7

La trinité de Galois

The Galois trinity

Read from the draft of 3 October 2026

galois’s windowPSL(2,p) on p points235711131719A4S4A5if admittedP1(F4)the Fano planethe biplanethe spinor windowSL(2,p) in dimension 2357111317192T2Ispin bundle nontrivialat 7, Ind ρ± = 6± ⊕ 8
Plate 7.1Galois’s window {5,7,11}\{5,7,11\} on the primes, where PSL⁡(2,p)\PSL(2,p) has a subgroup of index pp, beside the spinor window {3,5}\{3,5\}.
  1. 7.1
  2. 7.2
  3. 7.3
  4. 7.4
  5. 7.5
  6. 7.6
  7. 7.7
  8. 7.8
  9. 7.9

What do Galois’s three groups have in common when they are read as one family, and does the type law hold for one with no double life?

Galois’s theorem names three groups: PSL⁡(2,p)\PSL(2,p) for p=5,7,11p=5,7,11, the only ones of the kind with an action on pp points. Their point stabilizers are A4A_4, S4S_4 and A5A_5, the rotation groups of the tetrahedron, the octahedron and the icosahedron, and their pp-point geometries are five points of a conic, the Fano plane and a biplane on eleven points.

The group of order 168 has been worked through the whole first part. This chapter builds the seam tables of the other two, A5≅PSL⁡(2,5)A_5\cong\PSL(2,5) and PSL⁡(2,11)\PSL(2,11), reads the three as a family, and tests the type law on all of them. For PSL⁡(2,11)\PSL(2,11), a group with no double life, the outer automorphism appears at the prime 3 as a polarity of the biplane, through the ternary Golay code.

The central result · The law on the trinity

For p∈{5,7,11}p\in\{5,7,11\} let K=Q(p∗)K=\Q(\sqrt{p^*}), p∗=(−1)(p−1)/2pp^*=(-1)^{(p-1)/2}p, let MM be the lattice of the member, spanned in a permutation module by the character χ\chi of degree 3, 3, 5, and let TT be its explicit semilinear seam over the outer automorphism α\alpha, conjugation by an involution of PGL⁡(2,p)\PGL(2,p) outside PSL⁡(2,p)\PSL(2,p). At each prime ℓ\ell of the table the reduction Tˉ\bar T realizes α\alpha on the residues as follows.

(a) Split, ℓ=PPˉ\ell=\mathfrak P\bar{\mathfrak P}: Tˉ ⁣:M/PM→M/PˉM\bar T\colon M/\mathfrak PM\to M/\bar{\mathfrak P}M is an Fℓ\F_\ell-linear seam over α\alpha between two residues that are not isomorphic. For p=7,11p=7,11 the invariant hermitian form pairs them perfectly, and β(x,y)=h(x,Ty) mod P\beta(x,y)=h(x,Ty)\bmod\mathfrak P is a nondegenerate symmetric form with β(gx,α(g)y)=β(x,y)\beta(gx,\alpha(g)y)=\beta(x,y): α\alpha is a polarity of P(M/PM)\Proj(M/\mathfrak PM), orthogonal when ℓ\ell is odd. For p=5p=5 both residues are self-dual and the seam is not a duality.

(b) Inert ℓ\ell: Tˉ\bar T is a Frobenius-semilinear bijection of M/ℓMM/\ell M; the trace of z↦z+1z\mapsto z+1 does not lie in Fℓ\F_\ell, so no linear map realizes α\alpha.

(c) Ramified, ℓ=p\ell=p: M/PM≅Symk(Fp2)M/\mathfrak PM\cong\mathrm{Sym}^k(\F_p^2) with k=2,2,4k=2,2,4, and Tˉ\bar T is a multiple of Symk\mathrm{Sym}^k of a matrix of the involution: α\alpha is the diagonal automorphism, induced by PGL⁡(2,p)\PGL(2,p).

Proof

By machine, in exact arithmetic in KK and in the residue fields. That Tˉ\bar T has the stated type is an instance of the type law, TT being semilinear for σ\sigma. The polarity: TT is antiunitary and T2=1T^2=1, so β(y,x)=h(y,Tx)=h(Tx,T(Ty))‾=h(x,Ty)=β(x,y)\beta(y,x)=h(y,Tx)=\overline{h(Tx,T(Ty))}=h(x,Ty)=\beta(x,y).

Status

The seam tables of A5A_5 and PSL⁡(2,11)\PSL(2,11) are computed exhaustively, every subgroup and every subset and perfect matching of the line, and every computed entry is built; the column of X(11)X(11) rests on the modular description of that curve. The family statements are computed, and McKay’s correspondence for Galois’s three stabilizers is classical. The law on the trinity was computed in exact arithmetic at the primes of its table, each case an instance of the type law of chapter 6.

The pattern of the trinity, that Galois’s geometry appears at the first prime where its stabilizer has fixed vectors, is an observation on three cases, each explained by the theorem. It is not a general theorem.

Trois groupes, trois géométriesThree groups, three geometries

galois’s windowPSL(2,p) on p points235711131719A4S4A5if admittedP1(F4)the Fano planethe biplanethe spinor windowSL(2,p) in dimension 2357111317192T2Ispin bundle nontrivialat 7, Ind ρ± = 6± ⊕ 8
Plate 7.1Galois’s window {5,7,11}\{5,7,11\} on the primes, where PSL⁡(2,p)\PSL(2,p) has a subgroup of index pp, beside the spinor window {3,5}\{3,5\}.

A subgroup of index pp in PSL⁡(2,p)\PSL(2,p) has order (p2−1)/2(p^2-1)/2, prime to pp, and Dickson’s list of subgroups leaves only A4A_4, S4S_4 and A5A_5, of orders 12, 24 and 60; so pp is 5, 7 or 11. Each point stabilizer is the rotation group of a regular solid, and p2−1p^2-1 is the order of its double cover in SU(2)\mathrm{SU}(2): the exceptional actions are cut out by the regular polyhedra.

For p=5p=5 the subgroups of index pp form one conjugacy class, for p=7p=7 and p=11p=11 two, exchanged by an element of PGL⁡(2,p)\PGL(2,p) outside PSL⁡(2,p)\PSL(2,p). One class or two is the difference the type law will read at the prime where Galois’s geometry appears.

Theorem(Galois’s window) proved

Let p≥5p\ge5 be prime. Then PSL⁡(2,p)\PSL(2,p) has a subgroup of index pp if and only if p∈{5,7,11}p\in\{5,7,11\}. The subgroups of index pp are isomorphic to A4A_4, S4S_4 and A5A_5 respectively; they form one conjugacy class for p=5p=5 and two for p=7p=7 and p=11p=11.

La table des sutures d’A5A_5The seam table of the icosahedral group

1C2C3V4C5S3D10A4GG/HK160C2302C3202V41533C5122S310211D106211A451211G111111111
Plate 7.2The table of marks of A5A_5: row G/HG/H, column KK, the number of points of G/HG/H that KK fixes. The four rigid objects are in gold, and no two rows are equal.

In PSL⁡(2,5)\PSL(2,5) every class of subgroups is determined by the isomorphism type of its members, so the stabilizer class of an orbit can be read in any life of A5A_5 without fixing a marking, and every seam between orbits with the same stabilizer type is built by the stabilizer principle. The seam table has five columns: the five letters, P1(F5)\Proj^1(\F_5), the icosahedron, P1(F4)\Proj^1(\F_4) and the group itself.

The icosahedron’s column is classical. The object of size 12 is its vertices, 20 its faces, 30 its edges, 15 the golden rectangles of its edge axes, 6 its vertex axes, 10 its face axes, and the object of size 5 its five inscribed cubes, which are the five maximal sets of commuting involutions. The table extends the dictionary of chapter 6 from four objects to all nine.

Theorem(The subgroups of A5A_5) computed

A5A_5 has exactly 59 subgroups, in nine conjugacy classes: 1, C2C_2, C3C_3, V4V_4, C5C_5, S3S_3, D10D_{10}, A4A_4 and GG. The nine classes are pairwise non-isomorphic as groups, each is fixed by Aut⁡(G)≅S5\Aut(G)\cong S_5, and no two distinct objects have the same permutation character. Exactly four objects are rigid: those with stabilizers S3S_3, D10D_{10}, A4A_4 and GG, of sizes 10, 6, 5 and 1.

Proof

By machine: the subgroups generated by a class representative and one further element are enumerated and closed under conjugation, and the list is closed under joining any single element to any member, which proves it complete. Conjugation by an element of PGL⁡(2,5)\PGL(2,5) outside the group fixes every class.

Le groupe d’ordre 660The group of order 660

1C2C3V4C5S3aS3bC6D10C11A4D1211:5A5aA5bGG/HK1660C23306C32204V416593C51322S3a110622S3b110622C6110222D1066611C11605A4553411D1255713111111:512211A5a1132112111A5b1132112111G1111111111111111
Plate 7.3The table of marks of PSL⁡(2,11)\PSL(2,11), sixteen classes. The pairs the outer automorphism exchanges (blue) have equal permutation characters; the column S3aS_3^a (gold) separates both pairs.

PSL⁡(2,11)\PSL(2,11) is the group of the 660 Möbius transformations of P1(F11)\Proj^1(\F_{11}) of determinant 1. By Galois’s theorem it has two classes of subgroups A5A_5, of eleven members each. One is fixed and called A5aA_5^a; changing the choice changes the marking by an outer automorphism. The subgroups S3S_3 of a member of A5aA_5^a form one class, S3aS_3^a, and those of a member of A5bA_5^b the other.

The outer automorphism, induced by z↦−zz\mapsto-z, fuses only the two classes of elements of order 11. A pair of classes it exchanges therefore meets every class of elements equally often, since neither A5A_5 nor S3S_3 contains elements of order 11: the two objects of such a pair have one permutation character, and no seam joins them.

Theorem(The subgroups of PSL⁡(2,11)\PSL(2,11)) computed

(a) GG has eight conjugacy classes of elements, of sizes 1,55,110,132,132,110,60,60 and element orders 1,2,3,5,5,6,11,11; the centralizers are GG, D12D_{12}, C6C_6, C5C_5, C5C_5, C6C_6, C11C_{11}, C11C_{11}.

(b) GG has exactly 620 subgroups, in sixteen classes.

(c) Exactly seven objects are rigid: those with stabilizers D10D_{10}, A4A_4, D12D_{12}, 11:511{:}5, A5aA_5^a, A5bA_5^b and GG, of sizes 66,55,55,12,11,11,1. The other nine, of sizes 660,330,220,165,132,110,110,110,60, have automorphism groups GG, S3S_3, C2×C2C_2\times C_2, C3C_3, C2C_2, C2C_2, C2C_2, C2C_2, C5C_5.

(d) Out⁡(G)\operatorname{Out}(G) has order 2 and is induced by z↦−zz\mapsto-z. It exchanges A5aA_5^a with A5bA_5^b and S3aS_3^a with S3bS_3^b and fixes the other twelve classes, and the two exchanged pairs are exactly the pairs of distinct objects with the same permutation character.

Le biplan comme objetsThe biplane as objects

1234567891011the biplanepoints: the eleven A5ablocks: the eleven A5bincident: meeting in order 12any two points on two blocksany two blocks meet in two points
Plate 7.4The biplane on the eleven members of A5aA_5^a: one block in gold, a second in blue, meeting it in the two ringed points.

Take the eleven members of A5aA_5^a as points and the eleven members of A5bA_5^b as blocks, with GG acting by conjugation, and call a point and a block incident when they meet in a subgroup of order 12. This is the biplane of Galois’s eleven-point action: five points on each block, any two points on exactly two blocks, any two blocks meeting in two points.

Pairs of points and pairs of blocks are incarnations of one rigid object, with stabilizer D12D_{12}, so a unique seam joins them: it sends two points to the two blocks through them. A triple of points on a block lies on that block only, since two blocks meet in two points, so its stabilizer lies in a member of A5bA_5^b.

Theorem(The biplane as objects) computed

(a) The points and blocks form a 2-(11,5,2)(11,5,2) design, the biplane, and any two blocks meet in two points. (b) Its natural sets are incarnations of these objects: points A5aA_5^a (11); blocks A5bA_5^b (11); flags A4A_4 (55); antiflags D10D_{10} (66); ordered pairs of points S3aS_3^a (110); ordered pairs of blocks S3bS_3^b (110); pairs of points and pairs of blocks D12D_{12} (55 each); triples of points on a block S3bS_3^b (110); triples on no block D12D_{12} (55). (c) Conjugation by z↦−zz\mapsto-z carries points to blocks.

La table de PSL(2,11)The table of PSL(2,11)

subsetsof the linematchingsof the linethebiplanethe groupby conjugationX(11)660122330C2317220C32165V4213132C55110S3a3110S3b32110C666D102360C1155A455D127321211:5211A5a11A5b1G
Plate 7.5The seam table of PSL⁡(2,11)\PSL(2,11), one row per object: the sizes of the subsets and the orbits of matchings of the line, the biplane, the group by conjugation and the points of X(11)X(11). The row of the 60 (blue) has nothing on the line.

Every object except one is incarnated on the line itself, by subsets or perfect matchings of P1(F11)\Proj^1(\F_{11}). The exception is the object of size 60. A subgroup C11C_{11} fixes one point and cycles the other eleven, so an invariant subset is a union of those two orbits, with stabilizer 11:511{:}5 or GG, and no invariant matching exists, since the fixed point would be matched with a fixed point. The two orbits of eleven perfect matchings are Kostant’s icosahedral partitions: as a set for a subgroup A5A_5 the line is the vertex set of an icosahedron, and the antipodal pairs form a matching it fixes.

Klein supplies two more columns. The GG-invariant cubic forms on the five-dimensional representation make a line, spanned by Klein’s cubic x12x9+x92x4+x42x3+x32x5+x52x1x_1^2x_9+x_9^2x_4+x_4^2x_3+x_3^2x_5+x_5^2x_1, and X(11)X(11) lies on it. X(11)→X(1)X(11)\to X(1) is a Galois covering with group GG, branched over three points with cyclic stabilizers of orders 2, 3 and 11, so its elliptic points incarnate the objects of sizes 330 and 220, its cusps the object of size 60, and Riemann–Hurwitz gives 2g−2=−2⋅660+330+2⋅220+10⋅60=502g-2=-2\cdot660+330+2\cdot220+10\cdot60=50, genus 26. The object of the cusps is not rigid, Aut⁡G(G/C11)≅C5\Aut_G(G/C_{11})\cong C_5, so between the cusps and Kostant’s sixty elements of order 11 there are five seams, not one.

Theorem(The first block for PSL⁡(2,11)\PSL(2,11)) computed

Every entry of the columns P1(F11)\Proj^1(\F_{11}), biplane and the group of the seam table is a transitive GG-set whose stabilizers form the class of its row. The two orbits of eleven perfect matchings of P1(F11)\Proj^1(\F_{11}) have stabilizers A5aA_5^a and A5bA_5^b; every object except the one with stabilizer C11C_{11} is incarnated by subsets or perfect matchings of the line, and no subset and no perfect matching has stabilizer C11C_{11}.

Proof

By machine, exhaustively on the 4096 subsets and the 10395 perfect matchings.

Les pôles des solidesThe poles of the solids

01234∞P1(F5)A4: poles of the two-fold axes0123456∞P1(F7)S4: poles of the three-fold axes012345678910∞P1(F11)A5: poles of the five-fold axes
Plate 7.6The projective lines on the poles of Galois’s solids: P1(F5)\Proj^1(\F_5) on the six edge midpoints of the tetrahedron, the vertices of an octahedron; P1(F7)\Proj^1(\F_7) on the cube; P1(F11)\Proj^1(\F_{11}) on the icosahedron. In gold, an antipodal pair: the one nontrivial symmetry of the HH-set.

Let HH be Galois’s subgroup of index pp, with preimage 2T2T, 2O2O or 2I2I in SL⁡(2,p)\SL(2,p). A subgroup H′H' of the other class, or for p=5p=5 another member of the one class, has two orbits on the pp conjugates of HH, of sizes 1,4; 3,4; 5,6, with stabilizers A4,C3A_4,C_3; D8,S3D_8,S_3; A4,D10A_4,D_{10}. Read through the solids: the octahedral group acts on the seven points as on its three four-fold axes and four three-fold axes, the icosahedral group on the eleven as on its five inscribed cubes and six five-fold axes. For p=7p=7 and p=11p=11 the small orbits are the lines of a Fano plane and the blocks of the biplane.

Two more family statements are computed. G=HZG=HZ with H∩Z=1H\cap Z=1 for a Sylow pp-subgroup ZZ, which is Kostant’s reading of Galois’s theorem, since for p>11p>11 that subgroup has no complement. And the McKay correspondence: for each faithful character of degree 2 of 2T2T, 2O2O, 2I2I, the graph joining χi\chi_i to χj\chi_j as often as χj\chi_j occurs in ρχi\rho\chi_i is the extended Dynkin diagram E~6\tilde E_6, E~7\tilde E_7, E~8\tilde E_8, with the character degrees as its eigenvector of eigenvalue 2.

Theorem(The projective line as the poles) computed

(a) HH acts transitively on P1(Fp)\Proj^1(\F_p), with cyclic point stabilizer of order (p−1)/2(p-1)/2. (b) Let HH act as the rotation group of the tetrahedron, octahedron or icosahedron. As an HH-set, P1(Fp)\Proj^1(\F_p) is the set of poles of the (p−1)/2(p-1)/2-fold axes: the six edge midpoints of the tetrahedron, the eight vertices of the cube, the twelve vertices of the icosahedron. There are exactly two seams, exchanged by the antipodal map.

(c) Aut⁡H(P1(Fp))≅C2\Aut_H(\Proj^1(\F_p))\cong C_2, generated by the antipodal map, a fixed-point-free involution; its orbits form an HH-invariant perfect matching whose GG-orbit has pp members, with stabilizer exactly HH. (d) For p=7p=7 and p=11p=11 the edge graph of the cube, respectively the icosahedron, is an orbital graph of HH, distance-regular with intersection array {3,2,1;1,2,3}\{3,2,1;1,2,3\}, respectively {5,2,1;1,2,5}\{5,2,1;1,2,5\}, its pairs at maximal distance the antipodal pairs. For p=5p=5 the edge graph of the octahedron, the complement of the antipodal matching, is the union of two paired orbitals, since A4A_4 has no rotation reversing an edge of the octahedron.

Proof

(a), (c) and (d) by machine. (b) The polyhedral group acts on the poles of its kk-fold axes transitively with stabilizer CkC_k, k=2,3,5k=2,3,5, and A4A_4, S4S_4, A5A_5 each have a single class of cyclic subgroups of that order; by the stabilizer principle the two HH-sets are isomorphic, and the seams form a torsor under NH(Ck)/Ck≅C2N_H(C_k)/C_k\cong C_2.

La loi sur la trinitéThe law on the trinity

p = 5Q(√5)2the conic of PG(2,4)35Sym2, a conic11p = 7Q(√−7)2the Fano plane357Sym2, a conic11p = 11Q(√−11)23the biplane5711Sym4, a quartic curve23split: two residuesinert: Frobeniusramified: linear
Plate 7.7The three fields at the primes of the law’s table, each marked by its type. Galois’s geometry appears at the ringed prime: the conic at 2 for p=5p=5, the Fano plane at 2 for p=7p=7, the biplane at 3 for p=11p=11.

Each member gets its lattice by one construction. Let uu be z↦z+1z\mapsto z+1, w=(1+p∗)/2w=(1+\sqrt{p^*})/2, and χ\chi the irreducible character of degree 3, 3, 5 with χ(u)=w\chi(u)=w, w−1w-1, w−1w-1. Let m∈PGL⁡(2,p)∖Gm\in\PGL(2,p)\setminus G be an involution and α\alpha conjugation by mm, so that σ∘χ=χ∘α\sigma\circ\chi=\chi\circ\alpha. In the permutation module on the cosets of a subgroup H0H_0 normalized by mm, of type C2C_2, C3C_3, D10D_{10}, the vectors cj=∑gχ(g−1)egjc_j=\sum_g\chi(g^{-1})e_{gj} span a module affording χ\chi, and their span MM over O=Z[w]\mathcal O=\Z[w] is a GG-stable lattice. The map T(x)=σ(Pmx)T(x)=\sigma(P_mx) satisfies T(cj)=cmjT(c_j)=c_{mj} and Tg=α(g)TTg=\alpha(g)T: an explicit semilinear seam over α\alpha on the lattice itself.

So every statement about the residues is a statement about the reduction of TT. For p=7p=7 the lattice MM is Klein’s lattice. For p=11p=11 it is the only GG-stable lattice up to scaling, and by Roulleau’s computation it is the period lattice of the intermediate Jacobian of Klein’s cubic threefold, with its principal polarization; it has no vectors of norm 1 or 2, and its 110 vectors of norm 3 lie on the 55 lines fixed by the centralizers of the involutions.

Proposition(The three lattices) computed

(a) In Q(5)\Q(\sqrt5) the primes 2,3 are inert, 5 ramifies and 11 splits; in Q(−7)\Q(\sqrt{-7}), 2,11 split, 3,5 are inert and 7 ramifies; in Q(−11)\Q(\sqrt{-11}), 3,5,23 split, 2,7 are inert and 11 ramifies.

(b) For p=7,11p=7,11 the invariant hermitian form on MM, rescaled by a positive rational, is unimodular and TT is antiunitary. For p=5p=5 the invariant symmetric form has Gram determinant 10(2+w)10(2+w), of norm 500.

(c) For p=7,11p=7,11 the reduction of MM is absolutely irreducible at every prime, and MM is the only GG-stable lattice up to scaling. For p=5p=5 it is absolutely irreducible at 3 and at 5\sqrt5, while M/2MM/2M is indecomposable with composition factors of dimensions 1 and 2.

Le biplan modulo 3The biplane at three

1234567891011the 11-cap of PG(4,3)its code, [11,5,6]:1 + 132y6 + 110y9the dual, ternary Golay:1 + 132y5 + 132y6 + 330y8+ 110y9 + 24y1166 supports of weight 5: S(4,5,11)ringed: five absolute points
Plate 7.8The biplane at 3 as the eleven points of a cap of PG(4,3)\mathrm{PG}(4,3): a block of the biplane (gold) is five cap points on one hyperplane; a block of the Golay code’s S(4,5,11)S(4,5,11) that is not the biplane’s is in blue; a polarity of the biplane has the five ringed absolute points.

At a prime P\mathfrak P over 3 the residue is PG(4,3)\mathrm{PG}(4,3). Each member of one class of A5A_5 fixes exactly one point of it and no hyperplane, each member of the other exactly one hyperplane and no point, and at Pˉ\bar{\mathfrak P} the classes exchange roles. The point of xx lies on the hyperplane of BB exactly when xx and BB are incident in the biplane, so the biplane is drawn in PG(4,3)\mathrm{PG}(4,3) as eleven points and eleven hyperplanes, and the polarity of the law exchanges them.

The other primes give other pictures. At 5 no subgroup A5A_5 fixes a point or a hyperplane, the residue restricted to A5A_5 being the Steinberg module, and the six Borel subgroups of each A5A_5 give a frame, six points of a normal rational curve. At 2 the form reduces to a hermitian form over F4\F_4, so G⊂U(5,2)G\subset\mathrm U(5,2), and again no A5A_5 fixes a point. At −11\sqrt{-11} the twelve points of the rational normal quartic form the orbit with stabilizer 11:511{:}5: this is P1(F11)\Proj^1(\F_{11}) itself.

Theorem(The biplane at 3) computed

(a) Every member of one class of subgroups A5A_5 fixes exactly one point of P(M/PM)=PG(4,3)\Proj(M/\mathfrak PM)=\mathrm{PG}(4,3) and no hyperplane; every member of the other fixes exactly one hyperplane and no point. At Pˉ\bar{\mathfrak P} the classes exchange roles. (b) The point of xx lies on the hyperplane of BB exactly when xx and BB are incident in the biplane.

(c) The eleven points span PG(4,3)\mathrm{PG}(4,3) and any four of them are independent: they form a cap. The code spanned by the rows of their coordinate matrix is [11,5,6][11,5,6] over F3\F_3, with weight enumerator 1+132y6+110y91+132y^6+110y^9. Its dual is the ternary Golay code, with weight enumerator 1+132y5+132y6+330y8+110y9+24y111+132y^5+132y^6+330y^8+110y^9+24y^{11}. The 66 supports of its words of weight 5 form a Steiner system S(4,5,11)S(4,5,11): the 11 blocks of the biplane and one orbit of 55. Its automorphism group has order 7920, the Mathieu group M11M_{11}, and so does the stabilizer of the eleven points in PGL⁡(5,3)\PGL(5,3), which contains the image of GG with index 12.

(d) The orthogonal polarity β\beta of the law carries the point of xx to the hyperplane of the block mxm−1mxm^{-1}, so it induces a polarity of the biplane, with five absolute points. (e) The orbits of GG on the 121 points of PG(4,3)\mathrm{PG}(4,3) have sizes 11,55,55, with stabilizers A5A_5, D12D_{12}, D12D_{12}.

Le motif de la trinitéThe pattern of the trinity

p = 5, at 2: inertPG(2,4): conic, nucleuspoints 1 + 5 + 15lines 5 + 6 + 10blue: tangents, all through the nucleusp = 7, at 2: splitthe Fano planepoints: one class of S4lines: the other classβ: points ↔ linesp = 11, at 3: splitthe biplane: the 11-capa block: five cap pointson one hyperplanethe conjugate prime: points ↔ hyperplanes
Plate 7.9Galois’s geometry in the residues: the conic of PG(2,4)\mathrm{PG}(2,4) and its nucleus at the inert prime 2 for p=5p=5; the Fano plane at the split prime 2 for p=7p=7, its points and lines exchanged by the conjugate prime; the biplane at the split prime 3 for p=11p=11.

For p=5p=5 the orbits of A5A_5 on the 21 points of PG(2,4)\mathrm{PG}(2,4) are 1+5+151+5+15, with stabilizers A5A_5, A4A_4, V4V_4, and on its lines 5+6+105+6+10, with stabilizers A4A_4, D10D_{10}, S3S_3: Galois’s five points are a conic, and the point fixed by A5A_5 is its nucleus. For p=7p=7, at the prime (w)(w) over 2 the seven points of PG(2,2)\mathrm{PG}(2,2) are fixed by the members of one class of S4S_4 and the seven lines by the other; at (w−1)(w-1) the roles are exchanged, and β\beta is a polarity of the Fano plane. At −7\sqrt{-7} the orbits are 8+21+288+21+28, with stabilizers 7:37{:}3, D8D_8, S3S_3.

Remark(The pattern of the trinity)

In all three members Galois’s pp-point geometry appears in the residue of the lattice at the first prime at which the stabilizer HH has fixed vectors, as the HH-fixed points: for p=5p=5 at 2, inert, the conic of PG(2,4)\mathrm{PG}(2,4); for p=7p=7 at 2, split, the Fano plane; for p=11p=11 at 3, split, the biplane, as the 11-cap and its block hyperplanes.

The type of that prime matches the action of Out⁡(G)\operatorname{Out}(G) on Galois’s classes. At an inert prime α\alpha acts semilinearly on one space and permutes the HH-points among themselves: one class, fixed by Out⁡\operatorname{Out}. At a split prime α\alpha passes to the dual, carrying HH-points to α(H)\alpha(H)-hyperplanes: two classes, exchanged. The projective line P1(Fp)\Proj^1(\F_p) appears at the ramified prime as the rational normal curve of degree dim⁡V−1\dim V-1, and there α\alpha is diagonal. This is an observation on three cases, each explained by the law on the trinity; it is not a general theorem.

The law holds on a group with no double life. The outer automorphism of PSL⁡(2,11)\PSL(2,11), which no second life makes visible, is seen at 3 as a polarity of the biplane, through the Golay code and M11M_{11}; and each of Galois’s three geometries is, in its own residue, the set of fixed points of his stabilizer at the first prime where it has any.

Which seams between the trinity’s incarnations the arithmetic source makes natural, and where it leaves a choice that Galois exchanges, belongs to the reciprocity law of chapter 16; for A5A_5 the drafts find an object fixed by the outer automorphism whose every incarnation has a Galois twin, and a non-rigid object with a canonical seam. The next chapter follows the twenty-eight bitangents of the Klein quartic out of the group of order 168, into the Weyl groups of E6E_6, E7E_7 and E8E_8.