Universal Kernel

type law

How does a Galois conjugation of a lattice’s field appear on the finite geometries the lattice reduces to?

A twisted Galois symmetry of a lattice is seen on its residues by how the prime decomposes: as a seam between two residues where the prime splits, semilinearly where it is inert, linearly where it ramifies.

2splittwo Fano planesc moves the primea polarity:points to lines7ramified0123456∞the conic: P1(F7)c acts trivially on F7a Möbius map ofnon-square determinant3inertPG(2,9)a plane over F9c turns F9 by its Frobeniusthe Frobeniusof F9
Plate 4.3The type law at Klein’s lattice: complex conjugation is split at 2, a polarity between two Fano planes; ramified at 7, a Möbius map of non-square determinant; inert at 3, the Frobenius of F9\F_9.
Definition(Lattices, residues, twisted Galois symmetry)

Let K⊂CK\subset\C be a finite Galois extension of Q\Q with ring of integers OK\mathcal O_K and Galois group Γ\Gamma. A GG-lattice over OK\mathcal O_K is a finitely generated projective OK\mathcal O_K-module LL with an OK\mathcal O_K-linear action ρ\rho of GG such that V=L⊗KV=L\otimes K is absolutely irreducible; χ\chi is its character. Its residue at a prime P\mathfrak P is the k(P)Gk(\mathfrak P)G-module VP=L/PLV_{\mathfrak P}=L/\mathfrak PL, and LL has good reduction at P\mathfrak P if VPV_{\mathfrak P} is absolutely irreducible.

The group of twisted Galois symmetries of LL is A^(L)={(σ,α)∈Γ×Aut⁡(G):σ∘χ=χ∘α}\hat A(L)=\{(\sigma,\alpha)\in\Gamma\times\Aut(G):\sigma\circ\chi=\chi\circ\alpha\}, and LL is twisted Galois stable if the projection A^(L)→Γ\hat A(L)\to\Gamma is onto. Then, when the automorphisms fixing χ\chi are the inner ones, σ↦ασ\sigma\mapsto\alpha_\sigma is a homomorphism Γ→Out⁡(G)\Gamma\to\operatorname{Out}(G) with kernel Gal(K/Q(χ))\mathrm{Gal}(K/\Q(\chi)).

Theorem(The type law) proved

Let LL have good reduction at P\mathfrak P and (σ,α)∈A^(L)(\sigma,\alpha)\in\hat A(L). Then LL has good reduction at σP\sigma\mathfrak P, and (VσP)α≅σˉVP(V_{\sigma\mathfrak P})^\alpha\cong\bar\sigma V_{\mathfrak P}. If σ∉D(P)\sigma\notin D(\mathfrak P), α\alpha is realized by a σˉ\bar\sigma-semilinear seam from the residue at P\mathfrak P to the residue at σP\sigma\mathfrak P (split type). If σ∈D(P)∖I(P)\sigma\in D(\mathfrak P)\setminus I(\mathfrak P), it is realized by a σˉ\bar\sigma-semilinear bijection of the residue, linear exactly when σˉ\bar\sigma fixes every trace (inert type). If σ∈I(P)\sigma\in I(\mathfrak P), it is realized by a linear map normalizing the group, not in it when GG is perfect and α\alpha outer (ramified type). If σ∘χ=χˉ\sigma\circ\chi=\bar\chi, α\alpha carries every residue of good reduction to its dual.

Proof

The conjugate lattice LσL^\sigma and the lattice LL twisted by α\alpha have equal characters σ∘χ=χ∘α\sigma\circ\chi=\chi\circ\alpha, so they are stable lattices in one representation; by Brauer–Nesbitt their reductions at σP\sigma\mathfrak P, σˉVP\bar\sigma V_{\mathfrak P} and (VσP)α(V_{\sigma\mathfrak P})^\alpha, have the same composition factors, and the first is absolutely irreducible. The three types are this isomorphism read according to whether σˉ\bar\sigma is a map between residue fields, a field automorphism or the identity.

Corollary(The residue forms of complex conjugation) proved

Let cc act on Q(χ)\Q(\chi) as complex conjugation, (c,αc)∈A^(L)(c,\alpha_c)\in\hat A(L), and LL of good reduction at P\mathfrak P. If c∉D(P)c\notin D(\mathfrak P), the residues at P\mathfrak P and cPc\mathfrak P are dual and αc\alpha_c acts as a duality. If c∈D(P)∖I(P)c\in D(\mathfrak P)\setminus I(\mathfrak P), the residue carries a nondegenerate invariant hermitian form and αc\alpha_c is realized semilinearly. If c∈I(P)c\in I(\mathfrak P), the residue carries a nondegenerate invariant symmetric or alternating form and αc\alpha_c is realized by a similitude of it outside the group. The trichotomy of forms is Gross’s; the reading of αc\alpha_c in each case is what the law adds.

Example

Klein’s lattice is a rank-3 lattice over Q(−7)\Q(\sqrt{-7}) with automorphism group of order 336. At 2=ppˉ2=\mathfrak p\bar{\mathfrak p} complex conjugation splits: the two residues are Fano planes, dual to each other, and αc\alpha_c is a polarity, a seam from points to lines. At 7 it ramifies: αc\alpha_c is an isometry of the conic form, odd on the eight points of P1(F7)\Proj^1(\F_7), a Möbius map in PGL⁡(2,7)∖PSL⁡(2,7)\PGL(2,7)\setminus\PSL(2,7). At 3 it is inert: G⊂PSU(3,3)G\subset\mathrm{PSU}(3,3) and αc\alpha_c is the Frobenius of F9\F_9. So the outer automorphism that exchanges the points and the lines of the Fano plane, and is a non-square Möbius map on the line, is one Galois conjugation seen at two primes.