Universal Kernel

Quatrième partie · À la poursuite des suturesChapitre 16

Une loi de réciprocité

A reciprocity law

en chantierRead from the draft of 3 October 2026

the other seven flex triangles turn with ity = 0x = 0z = 0(1:0:0)(0:0:1)(0:1:0)τ124powerτ
Plate 16.1The flex triangle of the coordinate points of Klein’s quartic: τ\tau runs from each flex along its tangent to the residual flex, and the seven other flex triangles turn with it.
  1. 16.1
  2. 16.2
  3. 16.3
  4. 16.4
  5. 16.5
  6. 16.6
  7. 16.7
  8. 16.8
  9. 16.9
  10. 16.10

When a theory singles out one identification between two incarnations of an object, does that identification come from the group’s arithmetic source, and is every twist it picks up around a loop a Galois symmetry?

For a rigid object there is nothing to choose: between any two of its incarnations there is exactly one seam. For each of the nine objects of the group of order 168 that have automorphisms there are ∣NG(H)/H∣|N_G(H)/H| seams between any two incarnations, and a theory may single some out by its own structure: inversion on the class 7A7A, the transvection of a vector of F72\F_7^2, the tangent at a flex of Klein’s quartic. Carried around a loop, such natural seams can return a nontrivial automorphism. On the twenty-four flexes, the tangent and the residual point compose to an automorphism τ\tau of order 3.

The program’s first central conjecture says where natural seams come from. Take a group with an arithmetic source, as the group of order 168 has Klein’s lattice over the integers of Q(−7)\Q(\sqrt{-7}). Every identification made naturally inside any of its geometries should come from the source; going around any loop, the only twists picked up should be Galois symmetries of the source’s field; and where no natural identification exists, a Galois symmetry should exchange the candidates. If it holds, three layers that the book treats apart, monodromy, double lives and completions, become one statement, in the way Artin’s reciprocity law contains the older ones, and a choice is unavoidable exactly where Galois acts on it.

For 168 the pieces are held separately. The type law says what a Galois twist does at each prime. Klein’s lattice carries all fifteen objects as its own data and induces every seam for thirteen of them. The two exceptions, the objects of sizes 84 and 168, are where the Galois involution limits what a natural construction can do. The draft now makes “natural” exact, proves the second and third parts for every source, and finds that the first, read as completeness, fails in both directions.

The central result · A reciprocity law

Let a finite group GG have an arithmetic source: a lattice LL over the integers of a number field KK whose residues at the primes and whose points at the complex place carry the geometries of GG. Then:

(i) every identification that a geometry of GG makes naturally between two incarnations of an object comes from LL;

(ii) going around any loop of natural identifications, the only twists picked up are Galois symmetries of the source’s field;

(iii) where no natural identification exists, it is because a Galois symmetry exchanges the candidates.

For G=PSL⁡(2,7)G=\PSL(2,7) the source is Klein’s lattice L∞L_\infty over Z[α]\Z[\alpha], α=(−1+−7)/2\alpha=(-1+\sqrt{-7})/2, with its group of isometries {±1}×G0\{\pm1\}\times G_0, G0≅GG_0\cong G.

Status

Conjectured, and stated so far only in words. For the group of order 168 every piece below is a theorem of the draft or an exhaustive computation in exact arithmetic: seam monodromy as non-abelian cohomology, the type law and its six global lattices, the fifteen objects as data of Klein’s lattice, the seams the lattice induces, the bound that the Galois involution puts on natural automorphisms, and the Galois action on Klein’s quartic. There “natural” has a working definition, an automorphism that commutes with −1-1 and with the antilinear isometries of the lattice; the general statement must say what replaces it, and which fields count as the source’s: the twist τ\tau is a Galois symmetry of Q(ζ7)\Q(\zeta_7) over Q(−7)\Q(\sqrt{-7}), a field of roots of unity over the source’s.

The general check is now in the draft. With a seam called natural when it commutes with every linear and Galois-semilinear symmetry of the source, the second and third parts hold for every source, proved: natural seams between two incarnations exist exactly when their forms, classes in a non-abelian cohomology set, agree; they then form a torsor under the natural automorphisms; and the twisted part of every loop is a twist of the type law. For 168, around loops of natural seams through 2, ∞\infty and 7 the holonomies are exactly the natural automorphisms, computed. The first part, read as completeness, natural if and only if induced, fails in both directions, with each failure explained. The ingredients are classical; whether the statement about the whole network is new needs a search of the literature before anyone calls it so.

Sutures naturelles et monodromieNatural seams and monodromy

the other seven flex triangles turn with ity = 0x = 0z = 0(1:0:0)(0:0:1)(0:1:0)τ124powerτ
Plate 16.1The flex triangle of the coordinate points of Klein’s quartic: τ\tau runs from each flex along its tangent to the residual flex, and the seven other flex triangles turn with it.

A seam system is a family of incarnations of one object with a set of seams between them, and its monodromy around a cycle is the composite of the seams, an automorphism of the incarnation it starts from. On the object of size 24, whose automorphism group is NG(C7)/C7≅C3N_G(C_7)/C_7\cong C_3, theories supply seams by their own conventions: inversion 7A→7B7A\to7B, the transvection ±v↦(w↦w+det⁡(v,w) v)\pm v\mapsto(w\mapsto w+\det(v,w)\,v), the rotation by which a flex’s stabilizer turns its tangent line, the Singer collineation of a cyclic labelling. Where these meet, they agree.

One theory can also supply two seams between the same pair of incarnations. A flex of Klein’s quartic goes to its tangent line, and a flex tangent goes to the one other point where it meets the curve, again a flex. Their composite τ\tau, a flex to the other flex on its tangent, has order 3: τ(1:0:0)=(0:0:1)\tau(1{:}0{:}0)=(0{:}0{:}1), τ(0:0:1)=(0:1:0)\tau(0{:}0{:}1)=(0{:}1{:}0), τ(0:1:0)=(1:0:0)\tau(0{:}1{:}0)=(1{:}0{:}0). The power of an automorphism, the exponent kk with which it acts on a conjugacy class through any seam, makes it comparable across theories: under every seam, τ\tau is Hall’s multiplier 2 on the cyclic labellings of the Fano plane and the fourth-power map on 7A7A.

Theorem(Monodromy of the object of size 24) proved

The composite τ\tau of the tangent seam and the residual-point seam is an automorphism of the flexes of power 4. So the cycle flexes →\to flex tangents →\to flexes along these two natural seams has monodromy of order 3, and τ\tau turns each flex triangle cyclically. Under every seam between the flexes and the cyclic labellings, τ\tau corresponds to Hall’s multiplier 2, and both correspond to the fourth-power map on 7A7A and 7B7B.

Proof

The rotation seam sends the flex (0:0:1)(0{:}0{:}1) to g ⁣:z↦z+1g\colon z\mapsto z+1, which turns its tangent by ζ=e2πi/7\zeta=e^{2\pi i/7}, and the flex (0:1:0)(0{:}1{:}0) to g4g^4, since ρ(g)4\rho(g)^4 acts there by ζ8=ζ\zeta^8=\zeta. As τ(0:0:1)=(0:1:0)\tau(0{:}0{:}1)=(0{:}1{:}0), the rotation seam carries τ\tau to a map sending gg to g4g^4, which is the fourth-power map, and an automorphism of this object is fixed by its power. The agreement with Hall’s multiplier was computed through the natural seams.

La monodromie comme cohomologieMonodromy as cohomology

0123456∞the 12 neighbours of {0, ∞}0123456∞a star triangle, a 2-cell{∞, 0} → {∞, 1}: z ↦ z + 1{∞, 1} → {∞, 2}: z ↦ z + 1{∞, 2} → {∞, 0}: z ↦ z + 5holonomy: the identity0123456∞a triangle that is no 2-cell{∞, 0} → {0, 1}: z ↦ z/(z + 1){0, 1} → {∞, 1}: z ↦ (2z + 6)/z{∞, 1} → {∞, 0}: z ↦ z + 6holonomy: z ↦ −1/z
Plate 16.2The complex of stars at the pair {0,∞}\{0,\infty\}, its twelve neighbours the pairs sharing a point with it: around a triangle of pairs through one point the transports close up; around the triangle {∞,0},{0,1},{1,∞}\{\infty,0\},\{0,1\},\{1,\infty\} the holonomy is z↦−1/zz\mapsto-1/z.

A choice of alignments, one for each vertex of a graph of incarnations, turns a seam system into link variables Ue∈A=NG(H)/HU_e\in A=N_G(H)/H, and another choice changes them by aw−1Ueava_w^{-1}U_ea_v: a seam system is a lattice gauge connection, its monodromy the holonomy, and it is coherent exactly when it is gauge-equivalent to the trivial one. This is the classical dictionary between local systems on a graph and representations of its fundamental group, with the gauge group supplied by the stabilizer principle. An example: over the twenty-eight pairs of points of the sky, the book’s family of algebras su(3)\mathfrak{su}(3) is carried from one pair to a pair sharing a point by the element of order 7 fixing that point. Around each triangle of pairs through one point the transports close up; around the triangle {∞,0},{0,1},{1,∞}\{\infty,0\},\{0,1\},\{1,\infty\} they return z↦−1/zz\mapsto-1/z, which exchanges ∞\infty and 0.

Allowing seams over automorphisms, changes of marking, enlarges the gauge group to Aut⁡tw(X)\Aut^{\mathrm{tw}}(X), an extension of Aut⁡(G)[H]\Aut(G)_{[H]} by AA. The question whether an object’s twisted seams can be chosen consistently is then whether this extension splits. For the group of order 168 it does for all fifteen objects, so every object whose class Aut⁡(G)\Aut(G) fixes is the restriction of a PGL⁡(2,7)\PGL(2,7)-set. The non-neutral cases appear only at the double cover, on its objects of sizes 112 and 336. This is the monodromy layer that a reciprocity law would have to contain.

Theorem(Seam monodromy is non-abelian H1H^1) proved

Let G\mathcal G be a connected graph with fundamental group π\pi, and XX an object with stabilizer HH and automorphism group A≅NG(H)/HA\cong N_G(H)/H. The gauge classes of seam systems for XX over G\mathcal G correspond to H1(π,A)=Hom⁡(π,A)/AH^1(\pi,A)=\operatorname{Hom}(\pi,A)/A, and to the principal AA-coverings of G\mathcal G whose fibre over a vertex is the set of alignments there. The system is coherent exactly when its class is trivial. With seams over automorphisms, the classes are H1(π,Aut⁡tw(X))H^1(\pi,\Aut^{\mathrm{tw}}(X)).

Proof

Choose a spanning tree and the gauge in which the link variables are 1 on its edges; the others are the images of the free generators of π\pi, and the remaining freedom is one element of AA acting by conjugation. A principal AA-covering of a connected graph is determined by its holonomy, and in a gauge the transition maps of the covering by alignments are the link variables. The argument uses only that link variables compose in a group, so it holds with Aut⁡tw(X)\Aut^{\mathrm{tw}}(X) in place of AA.

La source arithmétique : le réseau de KleinThe arithmetic source: Klein’s lattice

normcountabove, the vectors by orbit; below, the pairs ±v, at the same scaleabove, the vectors by orbit; below, the pairs ±v, at the same scale242C4 · 42D8 · 21356C3 · 56S3 · 28484C4 · 42C4 · 42D8 · 21D8 · 2151681 · 168C2 · 846280C3 · 56C3 · 561 · 168S3 · 28S3 · 28C2 · 8473361 · 1681 · 1681 · 1688462C4 · 42C4 · 42C4 · 421 · 1681 · 168D8 · 21D8 · 21D8 · 21C2 · 84C2 · 84θ = 1 + 42q2 + 56q3 + 84q4 + 168q5 + 280q6 + 336q7 + 462q8 + ⋯θ = 1 + 42q2 + 56q3 + 84q4 + 168q5 + 280q6 + 336q7 + 462q8 + ⋯
Plate 16.3Klein’s lattice up to norm 8, each shell split into the orbits of G0G_0 (above) and of its pairs ±v\pm v (below), labelled by stabilizer class; lit, the 21 root pairs and the 28 pairs of norm 3 that the three completions read.

Let E=Q(−7)E=\Q(\sqrt{-7}) with integers Z[α]\Z[\alpha], α=(−1+−7)/2\alpha=(-1+\sqrt{-7})/2, so that 2=ααˉ2=\alpha\bar\alpha splits and 7=−−7 27=-\sqrt{-7}^{\,2} ramifies. Up to scaling and an automorphism of GG there is one hermitian Z[α]\Z[\alpha]-lattice of rank 3 with a faithful action of GG, and one member of the family is unimodular: Klein’s lattice L∞=(1−ζ)−1Z[ζ]L_\infty=(1-\zeta)^{-1}\Z[\zeta], with the form h(x,y)=tr⁡Q(ζ)/E(xyˉ)h(x,y)=\operatorname{tr}_{\Q(\zeta)/E}(x\bar y). Its isometries are {±1}×G0\{\pm1\}\times G_0, 336 of them, with G0≅GG_0\cong G carrying the character of Klein’s representation. In Elkies’ model it is spanned by (2,0,0)(2,0,0), (α,α,0)(\alpha,\alpha,0) and (αˉ,1,1)(\bar\alpha,1,1) with the form 12∑xiyˉi\tfrac12\sum x_i\bar y_i, and its theta series begins 1+42q2+56q3+84q4+168q5+⋯1+42q^2+56q^3+84q^4+168q^5+\cdots.

The lattice carries the group’s two lives and the plane Klein found it in, at one vertex. Reduced modulo (α)(\alpha) and (αˉ)(\bar\alpha) it gives the Fano plane, the link of a vertex of the building at 2; reduced modulo −7\sqrt{-7} it gives a conic of eight points, the sky, the link of a vertex of the tree at 7; and over C\C it is Klein’s plane. A vector of norm 2 or 3 is read at all three places at once.

Theorem(One lattice, three completions) proved

The vectors of norm 2 of L∞L_\infty form 21 pairs ±v\pm v, and those of norm 3 form 28. (1) In Klein’s plane, sv(x)=−x+h(x,v)vs_v(x)=-x+h(x,v)v for vv of norm 2 runs through the 21 involutions of G0G_0, and P(v⊥)\mathbb P(v^\perp) for vv of norm 3 through the 28 bitangents of the quartic. (2) At 2, v↦(v mod α, (v mod αˉ)⊥)v\mapsto(v\bmod\alpha,\ (v\bmod\bar\alpha)^\perp) carries the pairs of norm 2 onto the 21 flags of the Fano plane and those of norm 3 onto its 28 antiflags. (3) At 7, reduction carries them onto the 21 points inside the conic and the 28 outside it, hence onto the 28 pairs of points of the sky. These maps commute with G0G_0, so the bitangents, the antiflags and the pairs of points of the sky are three reductions of one set of pairs of vectors, joined by the seams of the object of size 28.

Proof

(1) Unimodularity makes h(x,v)h(x,v) integral, so svs_v preserves the lattice; it fixes vv and is −1-1 on v⊥v^\perp, and distinct pairs give distinct centres. The invariant quartic forms make one line over EE, and on each of the 28 lines v⊥v^\perp the quartic restricts to a square. (2) The pairing hh modulo (α)(\alpha) between L/αLL/\alpha L and L/αˉLL/\bar\alpha L is well defined and perfect; the point lies on the line exactly when h(v,v)h(v,v) is even. (3) A point off the conic lies on no tangent or on two; there are 21 of the first kind and 28 of the second. Maps between incarnations of a rigid object that commute with the group are its seams.

La loi des typesThe type law

at 2: split(α)(α)(ᾱ)(ᾱ)cc2 = αᾱ: two residues F22 = αᾱ: two residues F2the Fano plane at (ᾱ)the Fano plane at (ᾱ)11223344556677c: the point 4 to the line 356,c: the point 4 to the line 356,a polarity: points to linesa polarity: points to linesat 3: inertcc(3)(3)3 stays prime: residue F93 stays prime: residue F9the field F9the field F900αα2α2α111 + α1 + α1 + 2α1 + 2α222 + α2 + α2 + 2α2 + 2αc: x ↦ x3, the Frobenius;c: x ↦ x3, the Frobenius;semilinear, of field typesemilinear, of field typeat 7: ramifiedcc(√−7)(√−7)7 = −(√−7)2: residue F77 = −(√−7)2: residue F7the sky, P1(F7)the sky, P1(F7)00112233445566∞∞c: z ↦ −z, fixing 0 and ∞:c: z ↦ −z, fixing 0 and ∞:odd, outside PSL(2, 7)odd, outside PSL(2, 7)
Plate 16.4The type law on Klein’s lattice: complex conjugation exchanges the primes over 2 and acts at 2 as a polarity of the Fano plane, at 3 as the Frobenius of F9\F_9, and at 7 as z↦−zz\mapsto-z on the sky, an odd permutation.

What a Galois twist does to a residue depends on how the prime decomposes. For a GG-lattice LL over the integers of a Galois field KK with character χ\chi, a twisted Galois symmetry is a pair (σ,α)(\sigma,\alpha) of a Galois element and an automorphism of GG with σ∘χ=χ∘α\sigma\circ\chi=\chi\circ\alpha. The type law says that α\alpha then carries the residue at one prime to the Galois transport of the residue at another, and the decomposition and inertia groups sort the result into three types: a seam between two residues, a semilinear map of one residue, a linear map that is not inner.

For Klein’s lattice, with cc complex conjugation and αc\alpha_c the outer automorphism: at 2=ααˉ2=\alpha\bar\alpha, cc exchanges the two primes, the two Fano planes are dual, and αc\alpha_c is a polarity, a seam from points to lines; at 3, inert, GG lies in PSU(3,3)\mathrm{PSU}(3,3) and αc\alpha_c is the Frobenius of F9\F_9; at 7, ramified, αc\alpha_c is an isometry of the conic form that permutes the eight points of the sky oddly, an element of PGL⁡(2,7)\PGL(2,7) outside PSL⁡(2,7)\PSL(2,7). The same reading explains the pattern of the double lives: for PSL⁡(2,7)\PSL(2,7) and A6A_6 the outer automorphism that exchanges a dual pair in one life and is a non-square Möbius map in the other is complex conjugation of the character field, the prime of the dual life splitting and the prime of the Möbius life ramifying.

Theorem(The type law) proved

Let LL be a GG-lattice over OK\mathcal O_K with good reduction at P\mathfrak P, residue VP=L/PLV_{\mathfrak P}=L/\mathfrak PL, and (σ,α)(\sigma,\alpha) a twisted Galois symmetry. Then LL has good reduction at σP\sigma\mathfrak P and (VσP)α≅σˉVP(V_{\sigma\mathfrak P})^{\alpha}\cong\bar\sigma V_{\mathfrak P}. In particular: if σ∉D(P)\sigma\notin D(\mathfrak P) there is a σˉ\bar\sigma-semilinear seam over α\alpha from the residue at P\mathfrak P to the residue at σP\sigma\mathfrak P (split type); if σ∈D(P)∖I(P)\sigma\in D(\mathfrak P)\setminus I(\mathfrak P), α\alpha is realized on VPV_{\mathfrak P} by a σˉ\bar\sigma-semilinear map (inert type); if σ∈I(P)\sigma\in I(\mathfrak P), by a linear map normalizing the image of GG, not in k×ρP(G)k^\times\rho_{\mathfrak P}(G) when GG is perfect and α\alpha is outer (ramified type). If moreover σ∘χ=χˉ\sigma\circ\chi=\bar\chi, then α\alpha carries every residue of good reduction to its dual.

Proof

The conjugate lattice LσL^\sigma has character σ∘χ\sigma\circ\chi and residue σˉVP\bar\sigma V_{\mathfrak P} at σP\sigma\mathfrak P; the lattice LL with gg acting as ρ(α(g))\rho(\alpha(g)) has character χ∘α\chi\circ\alpha and residue (VσP)α(V_{\sigma\mathfrak P})^\alpha there. The characters are equal, so the two are lattices in one representation over KK, and by Brauer and Nesbitt their reductions have the same composition factors; the first is absolutely irreducible, hence so is the second, and they are isomorphic. Read through a basis, this is the semilinear seam, and when σ\sigma fixes P\mathfrak P it is a semilinear map of one residue, linear when σ\sigma acts trivially on the residue field. If the linear map were a scalar times ρP(h)\rho_{\mathfrak P}(h), then g↦α(g)(hgh−1)−1g\mapsto\alpha(g)(hgh^{-1})^{-1} would be a homomorphism of the perfect group GG into its centre, hence trivial, and α\alpha inner.

La table depuis un seul réseauThe table from one lattice

1681norm-5 vectors84C2norm-5 pairs56C3norm-3 vectors24C7cyclotomic structures42C4roots1Gthe lattice28S3norm-3 pairs14A4bb-tetrahedra7S4bb-frames7S4aa-frames14A4aa-tetrahedra21D8root pairs42V4bb-frame pairs42V4aa-frame pairs87:3Mumford sublattices
Plate 16.5The fifteen objects on the line of their sizes, each with its native datum in Klein’s lattice; every orbit and every stabilizer class is computed from the lattice.

Every object of the group of order 168 is a native datum of Klein’s lattice, an orbit of G0G_0 on data built from L∞L_\infty and hh: the vectors of norm 5 (168, trivial stabilizer), their pairs (84), the vectors of norm 3 (56), the roots (42), the ordered pairs of root pairs in an aa-frame or a bb-frame (42 each), the pairs of norm 3 (28), the cyclotomic structures gg with g+g2+g4=αg+g^2+g^4=\alpha (24), the root pairs (21), the aa- and bb-tetrahedra (14 each), the eight Mumford sublattices, the aa- and bb-frames (7 each), and L∞L_\infty itself. A frame is three mutually orthogonal root pairs, an aa-frame one whose roots share a residue modulo αˉ\bar\alpha; a tetrahedron is four vectors of norm 3 with pairwise inner product −1-1.

Each place reads the data with a kernel of its own. At 2, where −1≡1-1\equiv1, a vector datum loses its sign; at 7 every native datum is read faithfully except those of norm 5; at ∞\infty the projective residue forgets scalars. The Fano plane of Part I is the reduction at αˉ\bar\alpha, the prime of EE that does not contain the character value of 7A7A, so its labelling is the arithmetic one.

Theorem(The fifteen objects in Klein’s lattice) computed

Each of the fifteen data above is a single G0G_0-orbit whose stabilizers form the class of its object. Moreover each root pair is orthogonal to exactly four others, the frames are exactly fourteen, seven aa-frames and seven bb-frames; the tetrahedra are exactly twenty-eight and each sums to 0; the cyclotomic structures are exactly the 24 elements of trace α\alpha; and the eight Mumford sublattices L∞(1−g)L_\infty(1-g) are the eight neighbours of L∞L_\infty in the tree at 7.

Treize objets sur quinzeThirteen objects of fifteen

168184C256C324C742C41G28S314A4b7S4b7S4a14A4a21D842V4b42V4a87:3
Plate 16.6The thirteen objects for which Klein’s lattice induces every seam, lit; dimmed, the object of size 84 and the regular object of size 168.

Call an automorphism of an incarnation built from the lattice natural if it commutes with −1-1 and, when the incarnation is stable under the antilinear isometries, with them too; a seam is induced by the lattice if it is a composite of residue maps that forget nothing, their inverses, natural automorphisms, and the actions of the Galois groups of fields of roots of unity over EE on residues over them. For the six rigid objects every seam is induced. For seven more the natural automorphisms realize the whole group NG(H)/HN_G(H)/H: −1-1 on the vectors of norm 3, on the roots and on the tetrahedra; Gal⁡(Q(ζ7)/E)\operatorname{Gal}(\Q(\zeta_7)/E) on the cyclotomic structures, where it is the twist τ\tau of the flexes; the exchange and rotation of the root pairs of a frame on the ordered frame pairs.

So for thirteen of the fifteen objects the lattice produces every seam: once one seam from the native datum to an incarnation is induced, all are. The two that fail are the object of size 84, with stabilizer C2C_2, and the regular object of size 168.

Theorem(Which seams the lattice induces) proved

Every incarnation in the book’s seam tables, and each of the five incarnations of the object of size 28, is a G0G_0-set of data of the lattice at one place. For the six rigid objects every seam is induced. For C3C_3, C4C_4, C7C_7, A4aA_4^a, A4bA_4^b, V4aV_4^a and V4bV_4^b the natural automorphisms realize all of N(H)/HN(H)/H, so all seams are induced once one is. For G/C2G/C_2 at most two of the four seams between two incarnations stable under the antilinear isometries are induced, and they differ by the involution of quotient class C4C_4. For the regular object, the natural automorphisms of such an incarnation form a group of order at most 6; on the vectors of norm 5 they are ±1\pm1.

Proof

A rigid object has one seam between any two incarnations, and the residue maps named are seams. For C3C_3 and C4C_4, −1-1 commutes with G0G_0 and with every antilinear isometry and moves a vector of norm 2 or 3 within its orbit, so it is the nontrivial automorphism; for C7C_7 the automorphisms are the powers of Gal⁡(Q(ζ7)/E)\operatorname{Gal}(\Q(\zeta_7)/E); the frame operations are defined by orthogonality alone and generate S3S_3. The two exceptions follow from the next theorem, with the instances computed.

Les deux rangées exceptionnellesThe two exceptional rows

D8 = N(C2), the half-turn at its centreC40123456∞{0, ∞} {1, 6}{2, 3} {4, 5}the coxeter pairingV4a0123456∞{0, ∞} {4, 5}{1, 6} {2, 3}V4b0123456∞{0, ∞} {2, 3}{1, 6} {4, 5}
Plate 16.7The three involutions of the object of size 84, named by the subgroups C4C_4, V4aV_4^a and V4bV_4^b of D8D_8 through its centre; the Galois involution fixes the first and exchanges the other two.

Conjugation by an antilinear isometry cc acts on the automorphisms of any incarnation stable under it, and the natural automorphisms are its fixed points. On the object of size 84 the automorphism group is C2×C2C_2\times C_2, its three involutions named by the three subgroups of order 4 of D8D_8 through the centre: C4C_4, V4aV_4^a and V4bV_4^b. The Galois involution fixes the class C4C_4 and exchanges V4aV_4^a with V4bV_4^b, so only the first involution is natural, and no natural construction picks out either of the other two.

With natural seams made exact (Formes et sutures naturelles, below), both rows read the same way. They are the rows on which the arithmetic symmetries act nontrivially on N(H)/HN(H)/H, so even between incarnations of one form only some seams are natural: two of four for the object of size 84, six of 168 for the regular object, or two for its vector form. That is a residual symmetry, a torsor of natural seams that is never a point, and not an obstruction: each row has one projective form, so natural seams always exist. Choosing a prime above 2, the same as fixing the labels aa and bb, leaves on the 84 only −1-1, which acts trivially on pairs, and all four seams become natural. On the regular object, even without the Galois involution, the automorphisms of the vectors of norm 5 that commute with −1-1 form a dihedral group of order 8, not all 168; getting all of them would need a base point, which no natural construction supplies.

Corollary(The two exceptional rows) computed

The objects G/C2G/C_2 and G/1G/1 are the rows on which the arithmetic symmetry group acts nontrivially on N(H)/HN(H)/H, so that even between incarnations of one form only some seams are natural: two of four for G/C2G/C_2, six (projective) or two (vector) of 168 for G/1G/1. Their exception is a residual symmetry, a torsor that is never a point, not a cohomological obstruction: G/C2G/C_2 has one projective form and G/1G/1 one projective form. The obstruction does occur, at the rows C3C_3 and C4C_4, which the lattice counts as induced because induction allows auxiliary choices: points of contact and eigenvectors for ii have the dihedral form, ordered pairs, imaginary points and the classes 3A3A, 4A4A the cyclic one.

Proof

The Galois involution fixes the involution of quotient class C4C_4 and exchanges those of classes V4aV_4^a and V4bV_4^b, so it bounds the natural automorphisms; this is the earlier bound for the group generated by G0G_0 and one antilinear isometry, an instance of the natural-automorphism theorem. The forms were found by enumerating the complements and their fixed groups.

Galois sur la quartique de KleinGalois on Klein’s quartic

00112233445566∞∞σ2: z ↦ 2zσ2: z ↦ 2z2 a square: even, in PSL(2, 7)2 a square: even, in PSL(2, 7)00112233445566∞∞σ6, complex conjugation: z ↦ −zσ6, complex conjugation: z ↦ −z6 not a square: odd, outside PSL(2, 7)6 not a square: odd, outside PSL(2, 7)
Plate 16.8The Galois action carried to the projective line: σ2\sigma_2 is z↦2zz\mapsto2z, an even map in PSL⁡(2,7)\PSL(2,7); σ6\sigma_6, complex conjugation on Q(ζ7)\Q(\zeta_7), is z↦−zz\mapsto-z, an odd map outside it.

Klein’s representation is defined over Q(ζ)\Q(\zeta), ζ=e2πi/7\zeta=e^{2\pi i/7}, and σa ⁣:ζ↦ζa\sigma_a\colon\zeta\mapsto\zeta^a maps the matrices ρ(G)\rho(G) onto themselves with σa∘ρ=ρ∘αa\sigma_a\circ\rho=\rho\circ\alpha_a, αa\alpha_a the conjugation by z↦azz\mapsto az. So αa\alpha_a is inner exactly when aa is a square modulo 7, and complex conjugation σ6\sigma_6 is the outer automorphism. Acting coordinatewise on the flexes, bitangents, centres and flex triangles of the quartic, each σa\sigma_a is a seam over αa\alpha_a; through the unique seams to the projective line it is z↦azz\mapsto az itself.

The automorphism groups of objects are realized by Galois groups of fields of definition: Gal⁡(Q(ζ21)/Q(ζ))\operatorname{Gal}(\Q(\zeta_{21})/\Q(\zeta)) exchanges the two points of contact of each bitangent, Gal⁡(Q(ζ28)/Q(ζ))\operatorname{Gal}(\Q(\zeta_{28})/\Q(\zeta)) acts on the eigenvectors of the elements of order 4 by inversion, and σ2\sigma_2, corrected by its twisting element, is τ\tau. The six objects whose class the outer automorphism moves have no incarnation among the points, lines and conics of the plane that is defined over Q\Q as a set; their incarnations come in pairs exchanged by the conjugation of −7\sqrt{-7}. The bridge between the points and the lines of the Fano plane, refuted for a fixed marking, is built over the outer automorphism by Galois conjugation.

Corollary(Galois-stable incarnations) proved

Let YY be an incarnation of an object among the points, lines or conics of the plane of the quartic. If some σ∈Gal⁡(Q‾/Q)\sigma\in\operatorname{Gal}(\overline\Q/\Q) with σ(−7)=−−7\sigma(\sqrt{-7})=-\sqrt{-7} maps YY onto itself, then the stabilizer class of YY is fixed by Aut⁡(G)\Aut(G). Hence the objects with stabilizers V4aV_4^a, V4bV_4^b, A4aA_4^a, A4bA_4^b, S4aS_4^a, S4bS_4^b have no incarnation there defined over Q\Q as a set.

Proof

σ\sigma restricts to some σa\sigma_a with aa a non-square, so it is a seam over the outer automorphism αa\alpha_a from YY to YY, and a seam over αa\alpha_a from YY to itself exists only if st⁡(Y)=αa−1(st⁡(Y))\operatorname{st}(Y)=\alpha_a^{-1}(\operatorname{st}(Y)).

Formes et sutures naturellesForms and natural seams

16816 of 168 natural84C22 of 4 natural56C3cyclic | dihedral24C742C4cyclic | dihedral1G28S314A4b7S4b7S4a14A4a21D842V4b42V4a87:3
Plate 16.9Where natural seams stop for 168: the objects of sizes 56 and 42 with cyclic stabilizers, which have a cyclic and a dihedral form, and the objects of sizes 84 and 168, whose natural seams are 2 of 4 and 6 of 168; computed in PGL⁡(2,7)\PGL(2,7).

Make “natural” exact. The arithmetic symmetry group AA of a source is the group of its linear and Galois-semilinear isometries that normalize GG; for Klein’s lattice it is {±1}×(G0⋊⟨b0⟩)≅C2×PGL⁡(2,7)\{\pm1\}\times(G_0\rtimes\langle b_0\rangle)\cong C_2\times\PGL(2,7), of order 672, with b0b_0 complex conjugation of Q(ζ)\Q(\zeta). A seam between two incarnations built from the source is natural when it commutes with every element of AA that preserves both: a natural transformation, in the sense of category theory, for the symmetries of the source. A seam that uses an auxiliary choice, a primitive root of unity, a square class modulo 7, a prime of an extension field, commutes only with the stabilizer of that choice, and that stabilizer is its naturality group.

An incarnation that AA preserves is a set with an action of AA, not only of GG, and its class as such, its form, is a class in a non-abelian cohomology set. Natural seams join incarnations of one form and none of two different forms. For 168 the objects of sizes 56 and 42 with cyclic stabilizers each have two projective forms: a cyclic one, where the Galois element fixing a point centralizes its stabilizer, as on the classes 3A3A and 4A4A and the fixed points of tori, and a dihedral one, where it inverts it, as on the points of contact of the bitangents and the eigenvectors of Klein’s quartic, since complex conjugation inverts eigenvalues. So the obstruction to natural seams sits there. The objects of sizes 84 and 168 have one form each, and their natural seams always exist but are never unique: 2 of the 4 seams, and 6 of the 168. In the strict sense they are residual symmetry, not obstruction. Around loops of natural seams through 2, ∞\infty and 7 the holonomies are exactly the natural automorphisms, and the twisted part of every loop is the Galois class: a polarity at 2, complex conjugation at ∞\infty, an odd Möbius map at 7.

Theorem(Forms, obstruction, torsor) proved

Let A′A' be a group of arithmetic symmetries with G≤A′G\le A', preserving the class [H][H] and an incarnation XX, and let BB be the stabilizer in A′A' of a point with GG-stabilizer HH. The A′A'-sets that are transitive GG-sets of class [H][H] correspond to the classes of complements of NG(H)/HN_G(H)/H in NA′(H)/HN_{A'}(H)/H, the pointed set H1(A′/G,NG(H)/H)H^1(A'/G,N_G(H)/H): the forms. A natural seam X→YX\to Y exists if and only if XX and YY have the same form; the natural seams then form a torsor under (NG(H)/H)B(N_G(H)/H)^B, the natural automorphisms; and a canonical seam exists exactly when the forms agree and that group is trivial. Forms exist if and only if the extension of A′/GA'/G by NG(H)/HN_G(H)/H splits.

Proof

A natural seam is an isomorphism of A′A'-sets, which exists exactly when the A′A'-stabilizers are conjugate: the stabilizer principle for A′A'. A point with GG-stabilizer HH has an A′A'-stabilizer meeting GG in HH and mapping onto A′/GA'/G, a complement, determined up to NG(H)N_G(H)-conjugacy, and complements of a normal subgroup in a split extension are classified by non-abelian H1H^1. The fixed points of A′A' on the torsor of seams form a torsor under the fixed group.

Ce qui manqueWhat is missing

168184C256C324C742C41G28S314A4b7S4b7S4a14A4a21D842V4b42V4a87:3
Plate 16.10Where the Galois involution acts for 168: the three pairs of objects whose classes it exchanges, and the objects of sizes 84 and 168, whose natural automorphisms it bounds.

The first part of the conjecture, read as completeness, fails in both directions. A seam built only from residue maps of data the arithmetic symmetries preserve, at the places of Q\Q, from Galois transports and from natural automorphisms is natural by construction. But the broader induction the lattice uses, which allows reductions at primes of extension fields and choices of square classes, reaches seams that are not natural: the reading of a vector of norm 3 by its ordered secant of the sky is natural only for a subgroup of index two not containing −1-1, and the reduction at the prime of Q(−7,−3)\Q(\sqrt{-7},\sqrt{-3}) over the Bianchi prime only for the linear symmetries; each joins incarnations of different forms and is natural for the stabilizer of the convention it uses. Natural seams need not be induced by any finite construction: the AA-stable regular orbits of Klein’s plane form a continuum, any two joined by six natural seams, and the orbit of (1:2:5)(1{:}2{:}5) receives six natural seams from the pairs of norm 7 with no construction from the source known to reach it. A statement that every natural seam is induced can hold only for a notion of induced seam that contains the stabilizer principle for the arithmetic symmetries themselves, and then it says nothing. The second and third parts, in the strict sense, hold.

Beyond 168 the same definitions find phenomena 168 lacks. For A5A_5 with the icosians, the object of size 12 has no incarnation stable under all the arithmetic symmetries, although its class is fixed by the outer automorphism: every incarnation has a Galois twin. For PSL⁡(2,p)\PSL(2,p) the unipotent object has such a form exactly when p≡3 mod 4p\equiv3\bmod4. And the object of size 15 of A5A_5 has canonical natural seams without being rigid: between the axes of the pure unit icosians, the pairs of points of P1(F5)\Proj^1(\F_5), the pairs of disjoint pairs of five letters and the involutions, exactly one of the three seams is natural, and these commute; no object of 168 does this. The type law also has a known edge: a life is seen only if its module is a residue of a lattice, and in dimension at most 4 that forces the group into Klein’s and Blichfeldt’s lists, so a reciprocity law must say what natural seams do on the lives that are no residue. Next: the double cover, whose objects carry gerbes that do not split; the law modulo 4 for PSL⁡(2,13)\PSL(2,13); and a closed notion of induced seam with a corrected statement of the first part.

Open questionopen

What corrected form of the first part holds: for which closed notion of induced seam, short of the stabilizer principle for the arithmetic symmetries themselves, are the natural seams of a source induced? Do the gerbes of the double cover, which do not split, obstruct natural incarnations of its new objects, as the object of size 12 of A5A_5 is obstructed?

In the strict sense the second and third parts are now theorems for every source, and the first, as completeness, is false as stated. What remains of the first part is a corrected statement, for a closed notion of induced seam short of the stabilizer principle itself, checked on 168 and on the other lattices of the type law: the icosians for A5A_5, Valentiner’s lattice for A6A_6, the Witting lattice for PSp(4,3)\mathrm{PSp}(4,3), where the group of arithmetic symmetries modulo GG is already non-abelian, and the double cover with its Weil lattice.

The next chapter is the one established piece of the network: what counting cannot hear and what finite sets cannot say are measured by the same Galois orbits. The product formula of Chapter 19 asks for the group’s order the question this chapter asks of its seams, and the epilogue’s question, whether every coherent symmetry of the network of all curves is arithmetic, is this one without the finite group.