Universal Kernel

Troisième partie · En montant la tourChapitre 9

Immeubles et réseaux

Buildings and lattices

Read from the draft of 3 October 2026

F72 = Z72/7Z72000000∞145236∞213465∞351624∞426153∞564312∞632541a vertex of the tree and its eight neighbours0123456∞LV for V the line of 0: the vectors (0, y)
Plate 9.1The vertex [Z72][\Z_7^2] of the tree of PGL⁡(2,Q7)\PGL(2,\Q_7): each of its eight neighbours is the lattice of vectors whose residue lies on one line through the origin of F72\F_7^2, and the eight lines are the points of P1(F7)\Proj^1(\F_7).
  1. 9.1
  2. 9.2
  3. 9.3
  4. 9.4
  5. 9.5
  6. 9.6
  7. 9.7
  8. 9.8
  9. 9.9
  10. 9.10

Where do the finite geometries of the group of order 168 sit once the field is completed, at the primes 2 and 7 and at the complex place?

Each life of a double life is a geometry over a finite field Fp\F_p, and Fp\F_p is the residue field of the pp-adic numbers. Over a local field the lattices up to scaling form a building, and a vertex of it sees a finite projective geometry: the Fano plane from a vertex of the building of PGL⁡(3,Q2)\PGL(3,\Q_2), the eight points of P1(F7)\Proj^1(\F_7) from a vertex of the tree of PGL⁡(2,Q7)\PGL(2,\Q_7). The chapter climbs from the finite geometries to these buildings, and from there to the complex place.

At 2 the octonion table glues Fano planes into a building over F2( ⁣(t) ⁣)\F_2(\!(t)\!) on whose vertices a group acts simply transitively, and Mumford’s lattice glues them, without that symmetry, into the building over Q2\Q_2. At 7 the projective line is the link of a tree. Over the complex numbers, the congruence that gives F7\F_7 as a residue field gives Thurston’s congruence link complement, whose eight cusps are the points of P1(F7)\Proj^1(\F_7) and whose cells carry every object of the group.

So the group of order 168 has two arithmetic parents at 7, of opposite real type, which share the finite line and not its completion. The chapter ends at the one vertex where Mumford’s arithmetic carries both lives of the group, and identifies the lattice there as Klein’s.

The central result · The group of order 168 at three places

The group of order 168 is the group of three local pictures. At the prime 2 it acts on the link of a vertex of the building of PGL⁡(3,Q2)\PGL(3,\Q_2), the incidence graph of the Fano plane, and the octonion completion gives the same link over F2( ⁣(t) ⁣)\F_2(\!(t)\!). At the prime 7 it acts on the link of a vertex of the tree of PGL⁡(2,Q7)\PGL(2,\Q_7), the eight points of P1(F7)\Proj^1(\F_7). At the archimedean place it is the group of deck transformations of Thurston’s congruence link complement, with its eight cusps. The plane life is seen at 2, and the line life at 7 and at infinity.

Proof

The theorems “The group of order 168 at two primes”, “The octonion completion in characteristic 2” and “The group of order 168 at the complex place”, below.

Status

The vertex links, the group at two primes, the archimedean place, the cells of MM and incidence as an absence are proved, with the finite checks named where they enter: the automorphisms of the Heawood graph by backtracking, the counts and orbits of cells on the line. The octonion completion lives in characteristic 2 by an explicit representation over F2( ⁣(t) ⁣)\F_2(\!(t)\!) and a covering argument, and that it is not Mumford’s rests on the rigidity theorem of Kleiner and Leeb. Mumford’s lattice as a triangle presentation, its two invariants, the symmetric gluings and the two completions of the sky at 7 are exact computations, with Mumford’s group rebuilt from Kato’s description; Thurston’s and Goerner’s identification of MM, Roe’s and Tits’s description of the unitary tree and Kneser’s method of neighbours are imported.

Klein’s lattice is classical (Gross, Elkies, Allcock and Kato, Nebe), with a self-contained proof of its uniqueness; its reading as one set of pairs reduced at three places was not found in the sources consulted. The sibling of Mumford’s lattice is Allcock and Kato’s in its first two parts and computed here in its third. Three bridges are settled: the octonion table and its triangle presentation, built for their shared triples and nothing more; the cusp torus and the octonion link, built for their shared configuration; and the two parents’ trees, built on the link, a type on the bare trees and refuted with their symmetry. One question is open: whether the unitary group of Mumford’s form over Z[1/14]\Z[1/14] has a torsion-free subgroup of index 168.

Le voisinage d’un sommetThe link of a vertex

F72 = Z72/7Z72000000∞145236∞213465∞351624∞426153∞564312∞632541a vertex of the tree and its eight neighbours0123456∞LV for V the line of 0: the vectors (0, y)
Plate 9.1The vertex [Z72][\Z_7^2] of the tree of PGL⁡(2,Q7)\PGL(2,\Q_7): each of its eight neighbours is the lattice of vectors whose residue lies on one line through the origin of F72\F_7^2, and the eight lines are the points of P1(F7)\Proj^1(\F_7).

Let KK be a field complete for a discrete valuation, with valuation ring O\mathcal O, uniformizer π\pi and finite residue field k=O/πOk=\mathcal O/\pi\mathcal O; here K=QpK=\Q_p, O=Zp\mathcal O=\Z_p and k=Fpk=\F_p. A lattice in KnK^n is a free O\mathcal O-submodule of rank nn, and two lattices are homothetic when one is a multiple of the other. The building of PGL⁡(n,K)\PGL(n,K) has the homothety classes [L][L] as vertices, two of them adjacent when they have representatives with πL⊊L′⊊L\pi L\subsetneq L'\subsetneq L, and the sets of pairwise adjacent vertices as simplices. For n=2n=2 it is a tree in which every vertex has ∣k∣+1|k|+1 neighbours.

The neighbours of a vertex are read off modulo π\pi, so a vertex sees a finite projective space: the eight points of P1(F7)\Proj^1(\F_7) in the tree over Q7\Q_7, the incidence graph of the Fano plane in the building over Q2\Q_2. All three parts of the theorem were also confirmed by computation with rational basis matrices, for (n,p)=(3,2)(n,p)=(3,2), where the link is the Heawood graph, with 14 vertices, cubic, of girth 6 and diameter 3; for (3,3)(3,3), with 26 vertices of degree 4; and for (2,7)(2,7), eight neighbours, no two adjacent, with the Möbius action even for diag(3,1)\mathrm{diag}(3,1), whose determinant is not a square.

A completion of a finite projective geometry Π\Pi over kk is a building of type A~n−1\tilde A_{n-1} with a vertex whose link is the flag complex of Π\Pi. The building lives over KK, a completion of a global field, and the finite geometry over its residue field. Completions are not unique: Q2\Q_2 and F2( ⁣(t) ⁣)\F_2(\!(t)\!) both have residue field F2\F_2, so each gives a completion of the Fano plane, and the chapter finds them glued in different ways.

Theorem(Vertex links) proved

Let L0=OnL_0=\mathcal O^n and, for a proper nonzero subspace VV of knk^n, LV={v∈L0: v mod π∈V}L_V=\{v\in L_0:\ v\bmod\pi\in V\}. (1) The neighbours of [L0][L_0] are exactly the classes [LV][L_V], distinct for distinct VV. (2) [LV][L_V] and [LW][L_W] are adjacent if and only if V⊊WV\subsetneq W or W⊊VW\subsetneq V. (3) For g∈GL⁡(n,O)g\in\GL(n,\mathcal O), gLV=LgˉVgL_V=L_{\bar gV}, where gˉ\bar g is the reduction of gg.

So the link of a vertex is the flag complex of PG(n−1,k)\mathrm{PG}(n-1,k), and the stabilizer of the vertex acts on it through PGL⁡(n,k)\PGL(n,k): for n=2n=2 the set P1(k)\Proj^1(k) with the Möbius action, for n=3n=3 the incidence graph of PG(2,k)\mathrm{PG}(2,k).

Proof

(1) A neighbour has a representative L′L' with πL0⊊L′⊊L0\pi L_0\subsetneq L'\subsetneq L_0, and such lattices correspond to the subspaces L′/πL0L'/\pi L_0 of knk^n; two of them are homothetic only if equal, since πjL′\pi^jL' leaves the interval for j≠0j\neq0. (2) If V⊊WV\subsetneq W then πLW⊊LV⊊LW\pi L_W\subsetneq L_V\subsetneq L_W. Conversely adjacency is symmetric, so suppose πLW⊊πjLV⊊LW\pi L_W\subsetneq\pi^jL_V\subsetneq L_W: for j≥2j\ge2, πjLV⊆πLW\pi^jL_V\subseteq\pi L_W, and for j≤−1j\le-1, πjLV⊇LW\pi^jL_V\supseteq L_W, both impossible; j=0j=0 gives V⊊WV\subsetneq W and j=1j=1 gives W⊊VW\subsetneq V. (3) gg preserves L0L_0 and πL0\pi L_0 and acts on the quotient by gˉ\bar g.

Une double vie en deux sommetsA double life at two vertices

at 2: the building of PGL(3, Q2)at 7: the tree of PGL(2, Q7)v1123224641451234567123145167246257347356the link of v0123456∞(1, 246), at distance 3 ↔ {0, ∞}
Plate 9.2At 2, an apartment of the building over Q2\Q_2 and the link of its vertex, the Heawood graph; at 7, a vertex of the tree over Q7\Q_7 with its eight neighbours. The gold thread joins an antiflag of the link, a point and a line at distance 3, to the pair of neighbours with the same stabilizer: one element of the object of size 28, seen at both primes.

Read with (n,p)=(3,2)(n,p)=(3,2) and with (n,p)=(2,7)(n,p)=(2,7), the theorem on vertex links puts the two lives of the group of order 168 at two vertices. In the building of PGL⁡(3,Q2)\PGL(3,\Q_2) a vertex sees the Fano plane and the group is the residue of PGL⁡(3)\PGL(3); in the tree of PGL⁡(2,Q7)\PGL(2,\Q_7) a vertex sees P1(F7)\Proj^1(\F_7) and the group is the residue of PGL⁡(2)\PGL(2).

The link at 2 has more symmetry than the group. Its automorphisms number 336, and the 168 that do not preserve the two types of vertex are the dualities, exchanging points and lines. On the line side they become the Möbius maps of non-square determinant: the isomorphism of the full automorphism groups, Aut⁡(Heawood)≅PGL⁡(2,7)\Aut(\text{Heawood})\cong\PGL(2,7), extends the double life by the dualities.

Theorem(The group of order 168 at two primes) proved

(1) In the building of PGL⁡(3,Q2)\PGL(3,\Q_2) the link of a vertex is the incidence graph of the Fano plane, the Heawood graph, and the vertex stabilizer acts on it through GL⁡(3,2)\GL(3,2), the automorphisms of the link that preserve the two types of vertex. The full automorphism group of the link has order 336.

(2) In the tree of PGL⁡(2,Q7)\PGL(2,\Q_7) the link of a vertex is P1(F7)\Proj^1(\F_7), and the vertex stabilizer acts on it through PGL⁡(2,7)\PGL(2,7); the elements whose reduction has square determinant act through PSL⁡(2,7)\PSL(2,7).

(3) The type-preserving automorphisms of the 2-adic link have eight Sylow 7-subgroups, and there is a bijection from them onto P1(F7)\Proj^1(\F_7) that carries the conjugation action of all the automorphisms onto PGL⁡(2,7)\PGL(2,7): the type-preserving ones onto PSL⁡(2,7)\PSL(2,7), and the 168 dualities onto PGL⁡(2,7)∖PSL⁡(2,7)\PGL(2,7)\smallsetminus\PSL(2,7).

(4) The 28 pairs of vertices at distance 3 in the 2-adic link, a point and a line not through it, and the 28 pairs of neighbours in the 7-adic link are incarnations of one object, and there is exactly one seam between them.

Proof

(1) and (2) are the theorem on vertex links; the automorphism group of the Heawood graph was computed by backtracking. Its type-preserving subgroup has index 2, so it is normal, and the whole group permutes its Sylow 7-subgroups. (3) A bijection carrying the type-preserving part onto PSL⁡(2,7)\PSL(2,7) carries the whole group into the normalizer of PSL⁡(2,7)\PSL(2,7) in the symmetric group of the eight points, of order ∣N(H):H∣⋅∣Aut⁡PSL⁡(2,7)∣=336|N(H):H|\cdot|\Aut\PSL(2,7)|=336 for the self-normalizing point stabilizer HH; so it is PGL⁡(2,7)\PGL(2,7), and the images were also checked element by element. (4) is the theorem of the twenty-eight, read in the two links: the object of size 28 is rigid.

Une complétion recollée par les octonionsA completion glued by the octonions

row x, column y: the z with ex ey = +ez00112233445566365406510162203431254λ(0) = {1, 2, 4}ex ex+1 = ex+3ax ax+1 ax+3 = 1 in ΓOrelabellings keeping it: 21the maps x ↦ ax + b, a ∈ {1, 2, 4}abelianization Z/2 × Z/2 × Z/6Ax = I + (1 + t)Mx, Mx(v) = wx v2Ax Ax+1 Ax+3 = t(1 + t + t2) Ifor every x: a building over F2((t))
Plate 9.3The octonion table as a gluing rule: row xx and column yy hold zz when exey=+eze_xe_y=+e_z. Each row is filled exactly on the line λ(x)=x+{1,2,4}\lambda(x)=x+\{1,2,4\}, the pattern is invariant under the twenty-one maps x↦ax+bx\mapsto ax+b, a∈{1,2,4}a\in\{1,2,4\}, and the matrices AxA_x realize it over F2( ⁣(t) ⁣)\F_2(\!(t)\!).

A building of type A~2\tilde A_2 with a group acting simply transitively on its vertices is described by finite data, a triangle presentation in the sense of Cartwright, Mantero, Steger and Zappa. Let (P,L)(P,\mathcal L) be a finite projective plane and λ ⁣:P→L\lambda\colon P\to\mathcal L a bijection. A triangle presentation compatible with λ\lambda is a set TT of triples of points such that (A1) some (x,y,z)(x,y,z) lies in TT exactly when y∈λ(x)y\in\lambda(x), (A2) (x,y,z)∈T(x,y,z)\in T implies (y,z,x)∈T(y,z,x)\in T, and (A3) for x,yx,y there is at most one zz with (x,y,z)∈T(x,y,z)\in T. Its group is ΓT=⟨ax∣axayaz=1 for (x,y,z)∈T⟩\Gamma_T=\langle a_x\mid a_xa_ya_z=1\text{ for }(x,y,z)\in T\rangle. By their theorem the Cayley graph of ΓT\Gamma_T is the 1-skeleton of a thick building of type A~2\tilde A_2, on whose vertices ΓT\Gamma_T acts simply transitively, with every link the incidence graph of (P,L)(P,\mathcal L).

The octonion table is such data. Take the imaginary units exe_x, x∈Z/7x\in\Z/7, with exex+1=ex+3e_xe_{x+1}=e_{x+3}, its rotations, ex2=−1e_x^2=-1 and ebea=−eaebe_be_a=-e_ae_b. Its 21 oriented triples TO={(a,b,c):eaeb=+ec}T_{\Oct}=\{(a,b,c):e_ae_b=+e_c\} are the rotations of (x,x+1,x+3)(x,x+1,x+3); the sets λ(x)=x+{1,2,4}\lambda(x)=x+\{1,2,4\} are the lines of a Fano plane, since {1,2,4}\{1,2,4\} is a perfect difference set modulo 7; and TOT_{\Oct} satisfies (A1)–(A3). The permutations of Z/7\Z/7 preserving it are the 21 maps x↦ax+bx\mapsto ax+b with a∈{1,2,4}a\in\{1,2,4\}, and the abelianization of ΓO\Gamma_{\Oct} is Z/2×Z/2×Z/6\Z/2\times\Z/2\times\Z/6, from the Smith normal form of the circulant relation matrix I+S+S3I+S+S^3, of determinant 24. So ΓO\Gamma_{\Oct} acts simply transitively on a building in which the triangles at each vertex are the oriented quaternionic triples of the octonions.

The bridge from the octonion table to this triangle presentation is built, since the two share their data, the set of oriented triples. Nothing more is identified. The octonions are not a group, and ax↦exa_x\mapsto e_x is not a homomorphism: exex+1ex+3=−1e_xe_{x+1}e_{x+3}=-1, while the group imposes axax+1ax+3=1a_xa_{x+1}a_{x+3}=1. In the classification of the triangle presentations of order 2 the table is A.1, Example 2 of Vaes and Valvekens, whose building is quoted as that of F2( ⁣(t) ⁣)\F_2(\!(t)\!); the theorem confirms this independently.

Theorem(The octonion completion in characteristic 2) proved

Let F8=F2[w]/(w3+w+1)\F_8=\F_2[w]/(w^3+w+1), σ(v)=v2\sigma(v)=v^2, MxM_x the F2\F_2-linear map v↦wxσ(v)v\mapsto w^x\sigma(v) of F8≅F23\F_8\cong\F_2^3, and Ax=I+(1+t)Mx∈GL⁡(3,F2( ⁣(t) ⁣))A_x=I+(1+t)M_x\in\GL(3,\F_2(\!(t)\!)).

(1) AxAx+1Ax+3=t(1+t+t2) IA_xA_{x+1}A_{x+3}=t(1+t+t^2)\,I and det⁡Ax=t(1+t+t2)\det A_x=t(1+t+t^2), so ax↦[Ax]a_x\mapsto[A_x] defines a homomorphism ρ ⁣:ΓO→PGL⁡(3,F2( ⁣(t) ⁣))\rho\colon\Gamma_{\Oct}\to\PGL(3,\F_2(\!(t)\!)). (2) ρ\rho is injective, and ρ(ΓO)\rho(\Gamma_{\Oct}) acts simply transitively on the vertices of the building of PGL⁡(3,F2( ⁣(t) ⁣))\PGL(3,\F_2(\!(t)\!)), which is therefore the building of TOT_{\Oct}.

Proof

(1) MxMyMzM_xM_yM_z is v↦wx+2y+4zσ3(v)v\mapsto w^{x+2y+4z}\sigma^3(v), and σ3=1\sigma^3=1; for (x,x+1,x+3)(x,x+1,x+3) the exponent is 7x+14≡07x+14\equiv0, so the product is II. Also Mx+Mx+1+Mx+3=wx(1+w+w3)σ=0M_x+M_{x+1}+M_{x+3}=w^x(1+w+w^3)\sigma=0, and the three pairwise products sum to w3x(1+w2+w6)σ2=0w^{3x}(1+w^2+w^6)\sigma^2=0. Expanding with c=1+tc=1+t leaves (1+c3)I=t(1+t+t2)I(1+c^3)I=t(1+t+t^2)I.

(2) By computation over F2(t)\F_2(t), with L0=F2[[t]]3L_0=\F_2[[t]]^3: the fourteen lattices AxL0A_xL_0 and Ax−1L0A_x^{-1}L_0 are the fourteen neighbours of [L0][L_0], [AxL0][A_xL_0] and [Az−1L0][A_z^{-1}L_0] are adjacent exactly when x∈λ(z)x\in\lambda(z), and the triangles of TOT_{\Oct} go to triangles. So the equivariant map g↦ρ(g)[L0]g\mapsto\rho(g)[L_0] carries each closed vertex star isomorphically onto its image. Such a map is a covering, and the building of PGL⁡(3,F2( ⁣(t) ⁣))\PGL(3,\F_2(\!(t)\!)) is contractible, so it is an isomorphism; the kernel of ρ\rho fixes every vertex, so it is trivial.

Le recollement de MumfordMumford’s gluing

the octonion table00112233445566365406510162203431254mumford’s lattice00112233445566103042506215362164453fieldF2((t))Q2relabellings211abelianizationZ/2 × Z/2 × Z/6Z/2 × Z/6normal complementyesnogluings kept by a group of order 21: 4,2 the octonion table and 2 its reversal, up to relabelling
Plate 9.4Two gluings of Fano planes over a field with residue field F2\F_2, as tables: the octonion table’s, circulant and kept by 21 relabellings, and Mumford’s, kept by the identity alone. Beneath, what separates them: the field, the abelianization, and whether the symmetry of order 21 has a normal complement.

Mumford built his fake projective plane from a lattice ΓM\Gamma_M in PGL⁡(3,Q2)\PGL(3,\Q_2), discrete, cocompact and transitive on the vertices of the building. Following Kato, let E=Q(−7)E=\Q(\sqrt{-7}) and α=(−1+−7)/2\alpha=(-1+\sqrt{-7})/2, so that OE=Z[α]\mathcal O_E=\Z[\alpha] and 2=ααˉ2=\alpha\bar\alpha, and let L=Q(ζ)L=\Q(\zeta), ζ=e2πi/7\zeta=e^{2\pi i/7}, so that α=ζ+ζ2+ζ4\alpha=\zeta+\zeta^2+\zeta^4. On LL, an EE-space with basis 1,ζ,ζ21,\zeta,\zeta^2, the form h(x,y)=tr⁡L/E(xyˉ)h(x,y)=\operatorname{tr}_{L/E}(x\bar y) is positive definite of determinant 7; modulo −7\sqrt{-7} it has rank one, with null plane N={x1+x2+x3=0}N=\{x_1+x_2+x_3=0\} of F73\F_7^3. Let Γ1\Gamma_1 be the image in PGL⁡(3,Q2)\PGL(3,\Q_2) of the similitudes of hh that preserve OL⊗Zℓ\mathcal O_L\otimes\Z_\ell for every prime ℓ≠2\ell\neq2, and ΓM\Gamma_M the image of those whose action on NN lies in a fixed Sylow 2-subgroup of the elements of GL⁡(2,F7)\GL(2,\F_7) of determinant ±1\pm1.

The stabilizer of v0=[Z23]v_0=[\Z_2^3] in Γ1\Gamma_1 is the Frobenius group of order 21 generated by multiplication by ζ\zeta and by ζ↦ζ2\zeta\mapsto\zeta^2; reduction maps Γ1\Gamma_1 onto PSL⁡(2,7)\PSL(2,7), and ΓM\Gamma_M is the preimage of a Sylow 2-subgroup, dihedral of order 8, with trivial stabilizer at v0v_0. For each of the seven neighbours [LV][L_V], VV a plane of F23\F_2^3, exactly one aV∈ΓMa_V\in\Gamma_M moves v0v_0 there, and the triples with aUaVaW=1a_Ua_Va_W=1 form a triangle presentation TMT_M: with a suitable numbering, the rotations of (0,0,1)(0,0,1), (0,2,3)(0,2,3), (1,3,4)(1,3,4), (1,5,2)(1,5,2), (2,4,6)(2,4,6), (3,6,5)(3,6,5), (4,5,6)(4,5,6), with the lines {0,1,2}\{0,1,2\}, {0,3,5}\{0,3,5\}, {1,3,4}\{1,3,4\}, {0,4,6}\{0,4,6\}, {1,5,6}\{1,5,6\}, {2,3,6}\{2,3,6\}, {2,4,5}\{2,4,5\} for x=0,…,6x=0,\dots,6. Its group is ΓM\Gamma_M, and up to relabelling TMT_M depends neither on the Sylow subgroup nor on the conventions, the prime (α)(\alpha) or (αˉ)(\bar\alpha) and HH or its transpose. All of this was computed in exact arithmetic in OE\mathcal O_E.

Two finite invariants separate the gluings: the abelianization of ΓM\Gamma_M is Z/2×Z/6\Z/2\times\Z/6, and only the identity relabelling preserves TMT_M, against 21 for the octonion table. Nor is TMT_M Example 1 of Vaes and Valvekens, whose building is also that of Q2\Q_2 and whose group has abelianization Z/3\Z/3. A stronger statement rests on the fields, not on a computation: no subgroup of finite index in ΓO\Gamma_{\Oct} is isomorphic to one in ΓM\Gamma_M. Isomorphic subgroups would make the two buildings quasi-isometric (Švarc–Milnor), a quasi-isometry would induce an isometry of their Tits boundaries (Kleiner–Leeb), the incidence graphs of the projective planes over F2( ⁣(t) ⁣)\F_2(\!(t)\!) and Q2\Q_2, and a collineation or correlation between them would make the fields isomorphic, against their characteristics 2 and 0. The octonion table glues with the symmetry x↦2xx\mapsto2x; Mumford’s gluing has none, and the symmetry of order 21 sits instead in the vertex stabilizer of Γ1\Gamma_1, which meets ΓM\Gamma_M trivially. In ρ(ΓO)⋊F\rho(\Gamma_{\Oct})\rtimes F, with FF generated by v↦wvv\mapsto wv and v↦v2v\mapsto v^2, which conjugate MxM_x to Mx−1M_{x-1} and to M2xM_{2x}, the lattice is a normal subgroup; in Γ1\Gamma_1, where ΓM\Gamma_M is its own normalizer with 21 conjugates, no normal subgroup acts simply transitively. At a vertex the two actions look alike, both stabilizers acting on the Fano link as the normalizer of a Sylow 7-subgroup of GL⁡(3,2)\GL(3,2). Globally one stabilizer has a normal complement and the other has none, and the theorem says why.

Theorem(Symmetric gluings live in characteristic 2) proved

Let TT be a triangle presentation for the Fano plane whose group of relabellings contains a subgroup of order 21. Then TT is equivalent, by a relabelling, to TOT_{\Oct} or to its reversal {(z,y,x):(x,y,z)∈TO}\{(z,y,x):(x,y,z)\in T_{\Oct}\}; so ΓT≅ΓO\Gamma_T\cong\Gamma_{\Oct}, and its building is that of PGL⁡(3,F2( ⁣(t) ⁣))\PGL(3,\F_2(\!(t)\!)).

Consequently, if a group acts on a building of type A~2\tilde A_2 with Fano links by type-rotating automorphisms, transitively on the vertices and with vertex stabilizers of order 21 acting faithfully on the links, and has a normal subgroup acting simply transitively on the vertices, then the building is that of PGL⁡(3,F2( ⁣(t) ⁣))\PGL(3,\F_2(\!(t)\!)) and not that of PGL⁡(3,Q2)\PGL(3,\Q_2).

Proof

A group of order 21 has a normal Sylow 7-subgroup, so a subgroup of order 21 of the symmetric group on seven points normalizes a 7-cycle, and after a relabelling it is the group of maps x↦ax+bx\mapsto ax+b, a∈{1,2,4}a\in\{1,2,4\}. Then TT is a union of its orbits on the 343 triples, and exactly four such unions satisfy (A1)–(A3), two equivalent to TOT_{\Oct} and two to its reversal. Reversal replaces each generator by its inverse, an isomorphism of groups preserving the Cayley graph.

For the consequence, a normal subgroup Γ\Gamma acting simply transitively is the group of a triangle presentation read off at a vertex, and for ss in the stabilizer saxs−1sa_xs^{-1} lies in Γ\Gamma and moves the vertex to sxsx; so the stabilizer acts on the presentation by relabellings, faithfully. The two buildings are not isomorphic, as their Tits boundaries show.

La place archimédienneThe archimedean place

0 ↦ 01 ↦ 1ζ ↦ 5∞ ↦ ∞the upper half-space over the eisenstein lattice0123456∞the eight cusps0516203142536405the cusp torusC/(2 + ζ), the lines x + {1,2,4} in gold8 cusps · 28 edges · 56 faces · 28 tetrahedra
Plate 9.5Thurston’s congruence link complement at the complex place: in the upper half-space over the Eisenstein lattice, the ideal edge from 0 to ∞\infty and the tetrahedron τ0={∞,0,1,ζ}\tau_0=\{\infty,0,1,\zeta\}, its cusps reduced by a+bζ↦a+5ba+b\zeta\mapsto a+5b; the eight cusps as P1(F7)\Proj^1(\F_7); and the cusp torus C/p\C/\mathfrak p, whose triangles carry the lines x+{1,2,4}x+\{1,2,4\}.

Let ζ=(1+−3)/2\zeta=(1+\sqrt{-3})/2, so that ζ2=ζ−1\zeta^2=\zeta-1, and O=Z[ζ]\mathcal O=\Z[\zeta], the Eisenstein integers, a Euclidean domain. PSL⁡(2,O)\PSL(2,\mathcal O) is a discrete subgroup of finite covolume of PSL⁡(2,C)\PSL(2,\C), acting on hyperbolic space H3\mathbb H^3 with sphere at infinity P1(C)\Proj^1(\C), and its cusps are the points of P1(Q(−3))\Proj^1(\Q(\sqrt{-3})). The element 2+ζ2+\zeta has norm 7; let p=(2+ζ)\mathfrak p=(2+\zeta) and Γ(p)\Gamma(\mathfrak p) the kernel of reduction PSL⁡(2,O)→PSL⁡(2,O/p)\PSL(2,\mathcal O)\to\PSL(2,\mathcal O/\mathfrak p).

Since 7=(2+ζ)(2+ζˉ)7=(2+\zeta)(2+\bar\zeta) splits, the completion at p\mathfrak p is Q7\Q_7, and P1(F7)\Proj^1(\F_7) appears twice for the one field: at the finite place as the link of a vertex of the tree, at the complex place as the cusps of the congruence quotient. One group sees both. ΓS=PSL⁡(2,O[1/π])\Gamma_S=\PSL(2,\mathcal O[1/\pi]), π=2+ζ\pi=2+\zeta, acts on H3\mathbb H^3 and on the tree of PGL⁡(2,Q7)\PGL(2,\Q_7); the stabilizer of the base vertex is PSL⁡(2,O)\PSL(2,\mathcal O), the elements fixing its eight neighbours form Γ(p)\Gamma(\mathfrak p), and [v]↦[v mod p][v]\mapsto[v\bmod\mathfrak p] identifies the cusps with the neighbours, a primitive vv giving the half-line of lattices Opv+pnL0\mathcal O_{\mathfrak p}v+\mathfrak p^nL_0.

It is also a congruence quotient of two arithmetic groups at primes over 7: of PSL⁡(2,O)\PSL(2,\mathcal O), a lattice in PSL⁡(2,C)\PSL(2,\C), and of Mumford’s Γ1\Gamma_1, a lattice in PGL⁡(3,Q2)\PGL(3,\Q_2) made of rational points of a group whose real form is compact. Both reductions give the line life, PSL⁡(2,7)\PSL(2,7) on the eight cusps and on the eight lines of NN, and in Γ1\Gamma_1 the plane life is present too, as the link at 2. This is not a double life, since both parents reduce to the same life. It is one finite life with two arithmetic parents of opposite real type.

Theorem(The group of order 168 at the complex place) proved

(1) O/p≅F7\mathcal O/\mathfrak p\cong\F_7, by a+bζ↦a+5ba+b\zeta\mapsto a+5b, and reduction induces PSL⁡(2,O)/Γ(p)≅PSL⁡(2,7)\PSL(2,\mathcal O)/\Gamma(\mathfrak p)\cong\PSL(2,7). (2) Γ(p)\Gamma(\mathfrak p) is torsion-free, so M=Γ(p)\H3M=\Gamma(\mathfrak p)\backslash\mathbb H^3 is a hyperbolic 3-manifold of finite volume, and PSL⁡(2,7)\PSL(2,7) acts on it as the group of deck transformations of M→PSL⁡(2,O)\H3M\to\PSL(2,\mathcal O)\backslash\mathbb H^3. (3) The cusps of MM correspond, PSL⁡(2,7)\PSL(2,7)-equivariantly, to the eight points of P1(F7)\Proj^1(\F_7). (4) (Thurston; Goerner) MM is the complement of an eight-component link in the 3-sphere, tessellated by 28 regular ideal tetrahedra.

Proof

(1) 52−5+1≡05^2-5+1\equiv0 and 2+5≡02+5\equiv0 modulo 7, and SL⁡(2,F7)\SL(2,\F_7) is generated by elementary matrices, which lift. (2) An element of finite order of SL⁡(2,O)\SL(2,\mathcal O) has trace λ+λ−1\lambda+\lambda^{-1}, a real element of O\mathcal O and so an integer of absolute value at most 2; if it is ±I\pm I modulo p\mathfrak p its trace is ±2\pm2 modulo 7, which none of 0, ±1\pm1 is, so it is ±I\pm I. (3) PSL⁡(2,O)\PSL(2,\mathcal O) is transitive on P1(Q(−3))\Proj^1(\Q(\sqrt{-3})), and the stabilizer of ∞\infty, generated by diag(ζ,ζ−1)\mathrm{diag}(\zeta,\zeta^{-1}) and the translations by 1 and ζ\zeta, maps onto the stabilizer of ∞\infty in PSL⁡(2,7)\PSL(2,7), of order 21. (4) Thurston drew the link and observed the tessellation; Goerner proved that its complement is the principal congruence manifold of level 2+ζ2+\zeta, and among the levels whose congruence manifold is a link complement only 2+ζ2+\zeta has norm 7.

Les cellules du complément d’entrelacs de congruenceThe cells of the congruence link complement

0123456∞class a: {0, 1, 2, 5}class b: {0, 1, 2, 4}1681a cusp with a face through it84C2an edge with a tetrahedron through it56C3a face42C4four cusps that are not the cusps of a tetrahedron42V4aa tetrahedron of class a with a pair of opposite edges42V4ba tetrahedron of class b with a pair of opposite edges28S3an edge24C7a cusp with a class of parallel edges of its torus21D8a partition of the cusps into two fours, neither the cusps of a tetrahedron14A4aa tetrahedron of class a14A4ba tetrahedron of class b87:3a cusp7S4aa complementary pair of class a7S4ba complementary pair of class b1Gthe manifold M
Plate 9.6The fifteen objects as configurations of cells of MM, each named by its cusps and its stabilizer computed on P1(F7)\Proj^1(\F_7). On the line, the two classes of tetrahedra, {0,1,2,5}\{0,1,2,5\} and {0,1,2,4}\{0,1,2,4\}.

The tessellation of H3\mathbb H^3 by regular ideal tetrahedra with a face on ∞,0,1\infty,0,1 has orientation-preserving symmetry group PGL⁡(2,O)\PGL(2,\mathcal O), in which Γ(p)\Gamma(\mathfrak p) is normal. So it descends to MM, and PGL⁡(2,7)\PGL(2,7) acts on MM preserving it, with PSL⁡(2,7)\PSL(2,7) the deck group. Identify the cusps with P1(F7)\Proj^1(\F_7) so that ζ\zeta goes to 5; the tetrahedron τ0={∞,0,1,ζ}\tau_0=\{\infty,0,1,\zeta\} becomes {∞,0,1,5}\{\infty,0,1,5\}. Every cell is determined by its cusps, so every configuration of cells is a configuration of points of the line, and its stabilizer can be computed there. Every row of the seam table then has an incarnation in the cells of one manifold: a cusp with a face through it (1), an edge with a tetrahedron through it (C2C_2, one orbit for each class), a face (C3C_3), four cusps that are not the cusps of a tetrahedron (C4C_4), a tetrahedron of class aa or bb with a pair of opposite edges (V4aV_4^a, V4bV_4^b), an edge (S3S_3), a cusp with a class of parallel edges of its cusp torus (C7C_7), a partition of the cusps into two fours that are not tetrahedra (D8D_8), a tetrahedron of class aa or bb (A4aA_4^a, A4bA_4^b), a cusp (7:37{:}3), a complementary pair of tetrahedra of class aa or bb (S4aS_4^a, S4bS_4^b), and MM itself (GG).

The two sets of 28 in MM are different objects. The edges are the object of size 28; the tetrahedra are two objects of size 14, whose stabilizers A4A_4 are not even isomorphic to the edges’ stabilizers in PGL⁡(2,7)\PGL(2,7), dihedral of order 12. So the type bridge between the 28 tetrahedra and the object of size 28, with equal size and one group, is refuted; through the Fano column of the table the tetrahedra are the complete quadrangles and quadrilaterals, each with one of its two orientations. Sending an edge to its two cusps is the unique seam from the edges to the 2-subsets, and composing gives the Sylow 3-subgroup fixing them, the antiflag it fixes, the bitangent of the Klein quartic through the two points it fixes, and a vertex of the Coxeter graph; two edges are adjacent in the Coxeter graph exactly when their pairs are disjoint and harmonic. For the edge from 0 to ∞\infty the subgroup is generated by z↦2zz\mapsto2z and the bitangent is x+y+z=0x+y+z=0.

A cross-section of the cusp at ∞\infty is C/p\C/\mathfrak p, triangulated by the 7 edges and 14 tetrahedra there: a torus with 7 vertices, 21 edges and 14 triangles whose 1-skeleton is K7K_7. Labelling the end of the edge from ∞\infty to aa by aa, the triangles are a+{0,1,5}a+\{0,1,5\} and a+{0,4,5}a+\{0,4,5\}. The second family is the family of lines x+{1,2,4}x+\{1,2,4\} of the octonion presentation, the first its mirror image, and the stabilizer of the cusp acts on the labels as the maps x↦ax+bx\mapsto ax+b, a∈{1,2,4}a\in\{1,2,4\}. The bridge to the octonion completion is built for this shared configuration, through ζ↦5\zeta\mapsto5, and for nothing more.

Theorem(The cells of M) proved

Let G=PSL⁡(2,7)G=\PSL(2,7) and G^=PGL⁡(2,7)\hat G=\PGL(2,7). (1) Each pair of cusps is joined by exactly one ideal edge, each triple of cusps spans exactly one ideal face, and an ideal tetrahedron is determined by its four cusps: there are 28 edges, 56 faces and 28 tetrahedra, each edge lies in 6 tetrahedra and each face in 2. (2) The cusp sets of the tetrahedra form the G^\hat G-orbit of {∞,0,1,5}\{\infty,0,1,5\}, with stabilizer A4A_4; under GG they fall into two orbits of 14, those of {0,1,2,5}\{0,1,2,5\} and of {0,1,2,4}\{0,1,2,4\}, the rows A4aA_4^a and A4bA_4^b of the seam table, and G^∖G\hat G\smallsetminus G exchanges them. (3) Under GG the edges form the object of size 28, with stabilizer S3S_3, and the faces the object of size 56, with stabilizer C3C_3.

Proof

The tessellation is regular, so the cells of each dimension form one PGL⁡(2,O)\PGL(2,\mathcal O)-orbit, and the cells of MM form the G^\hat G-set G^/Sˉ\hat G/\bar S, Sˉ\bar S the image of one cell’s stabilizer, isomorphic to it because Γ(p)\Gamma(\mathfrak p) is torsion-free. The stabilizers of τ0\tau_0, of the edge from 0 to ∞\infty and of the face {∞,0,1}\{\infty,0,1\} lie in PGL⁡(2,O)\PGL(2,\mathcal O) and map onto the full stabilizers in G^\hat G of their cusp sets, so each cell is determined by its cusps. Counts, incidences and orbits are then computed in G^\hat G acting on the line.

L’incidence comme absenceIncidence as an absence

lines: pairs of class bpoints: pairs of class a234601240345025614560136123524560146123601250234035613452222222222222222222222222222three on every row and column; two rows share one0123456∞0123456∞a pointa line through it
Plate 9.7Points and lines from the cells: the seven complementary pairs of tetrahedra of class aa against the seven of class bb, marked in gold where no tetrahedron of the one shares a face with a tetrahedron of the other. Each row and column holds three marks and any two rows share one: the Fano plane.

The Fano incidence, which the seam table carries in its plane column, appears in MM as an absence. Call the complementary pairs of tetrahedra of class aa points and those of class bb lines, and say that a point lies on a line when no tetrahedron of the one shares a face with a tetrahedron of the other. This is a Fano plane, its 21 flags have stabilizer D8D_8, and for each of the other 28 pairs exactly two pairs of tetrahedra share a face. Each face lies in exactly one tetrahedron of each class, so the tetrahedra of one class are the blocks of a Steiner system S(3,4,8)S(3,4,8) on the cusps, and two of them share no cusp or two.

This is not an accident of the computation. It holds for any two Steiner systems S(3,4,8)S(3,4,8) with no block in common, and the reason is a self-dual code.

So both lives of the group are visible in the cells of MM: the line life on the eight cusps, and the plane life on the code of the tetrahedra of one class, on which GG acts linearly and faithfully, G≅GL⁡(Va)≅GL⁡(3,2)G\cong\GL(V_a)\cong\GL(3,2). The seams from the complementary pairs to the points and lines of the Fano plane are unique, these objects being rigid, and the theorem says what they carry: incidence is orthogonality in a self-dual code, and orthogonality is the absence of a shared face. In the life of A8≅GL⁡(4,2)A_8\cong\GL(4,2) the thirty Steiner systems on eight letters are the points and planes of PG(3,2)\mathrm{PG}(3,2); two in different orbits share no block or six, as their point and plane are incident or not, and the two classes of tetrahedra of MM are a point and a plane not through it.

Theorem(Incidence as an absence) proved

Let A\mathcal A and B\mathcal B be Steiner systems S(3,4,8)S(3,4,8) on a set XX of eight points with no block in common.

(1) Under symmetric difference the blocks of A\mathcal A, with ∅\emptyset and XX, form a self-dual binary code CAC_{\mathcal A} of dimension 4; the complement of a block is a block, and the nonzero elements of VA=CA/{∅,X}V_{\mathcal A}=C_{\mathcal A}/\{\emptyset,X\} are the seven complementary pairs of blocks. The same holds for B\mathcal B. (2) A block of A\mathcal A and a block of B\mathcal B meet in one, two or three points; for complementary pairs PP of A\mathcal A and QQ of B\mathcal B, either every block of PP meets every block of QQ in two points, or exactly two of the four pairs of blocks share three. (3) The pairing VA×VB→F2V_{\mathcal A}\times V_{\mathcal B}\to\F_2, (A,B)↦∣A∩B∣ mod 2(A,B)\mapsto|A\cap B|\bmod2, is well defined and nondegenerate, and PP and QQ are orthogonal exactly in the first case of (2): calling the pairs of A\mathcal A points and those of B\mathcal B lines, that case is the incidence of the Fano plane P(VA)\Proj(V_{\mathcal A}).

Proof

(1) The blocks through a point, with the point removed, are the lines of a Steiner system S(2,3,7)S(2,3,7), a projective plane of order 2, so two blocks meet in 0 or 2 points and CAC_{\mathcal A} is self-orthogonal, of dimension at most 4. A block through three points outside a block BB meets BB in at most one point, hence in none, so it is X∖BX\smallsetminus B; then CAC_{\mathcal A} holds the sixteen sets ∅\emptyset, XX and the fourteen blocks, and is self-dual. (2) ∣A∩B∣=4|A\cap B|=4 would be a common block and 0 would make A=X∖BA=X\smallsetminus B a block of B\mathcal B; and ∣A∩B∣+∣A∩(X∖B)∣=4|A\cap B|+|A\cap(X\smallsetminus B)|=4. (3) Every word has even size; if ∣A∩B∣|A\cap B| is even for every block BB of B\mathcal B, then A∈CB⊥=CBA\in C_{\mathcal B}^\perp=C_{\mathcal B}, so A∈CA∩CB={∅,X}A\in C_{\mathcal A}\cap C_{\mathcal B}=\{\emptyset,X\}.

Deux complétions du ciel en septTwo completions of the sky at 7

the bianchi treemumford’s unitary tree0123456∞0123456∞one seam on the linkball of radius 3: 1 + 8 + 56 + 392ball of radius 2: 57 624= 168 · 73, |PSL(2, Z/49)|kernel on the link: sl(2, F7)ball of radius 2: 16 464= 168 · 2 · 72 = |SL(2,7)| · |F72|odd permutations on a link321S4F21PSL(2,7)masses: 1/24 + 1/168 = 1/21, the type-2 vertex's 1/21
Plate 9.8The sky completed twice at 7: the Bianchi tree and Mumford’s unitary tree, whose base vertices see the same eight points, joined by the one seam. On the balls of radius two the groups have orders 168⋅73168\cdot7^3 and 168⋅2⋅72168\cdot2\cdot7^2, and beneath, the quotient of the unitary tree, [S4][S_4]—[F21][F_{21}]—[PSL⁡(2,7)][\PSL(2,7)], with 121=124+1168\tfrac1{21}=\tfrac1{24}+\tfrac1{168}.

Both parents reduce to the sky at 7. For the Bianchi parent the object is the tree TpT_{\mathfrak p} of PGL⁡(2,Q7)\PGL(2,\Q_7); for Mumford’s, a tree of the unitary group of hh. Over E7=Q7(−7)E_7=\Q_7(\sqrt{-7}), ramified over Q7\Q_7, call an O7\mathcal O_7-lattice Λ\Lambda self-dual if Λ∨=Λ\Lambda^\vee=\Lambda and of type 2 if Λ⊂Λ∨⊂−7 −1Λ\Lambda\subset\Lambda^\vee\subset\sqrt{-7}^{\,-1}\Lambda with Λ∨/Λ\Lambda^\vee/\Lambda of length 2, and join a lattice of type 2 to the self-dual lattices between it and its dual. By the description of the buildings of unitary groups over tamely ramified extensions (Roe; Tits; Carbone), this graph T7T_7 is the Bruhat–Tits tree of U(h)\mathrm U(h) over Q7\Q_7.

Λ0=OL⊗O7\Lambda_0=\mathcal O_L\otimes\mathcal O_7 is of type 2, and −7\sqrt{-7} maps Λ0∨/Λ0\Lambda_0^\vee/\Lambda_0 onto the null plane NN with a nondegenerate alternating form. Every vertex has eight neighbours, one for each line of Λ∨/Λ\Lambda^\vee/\Lambda or each isotropic line of the ternary form on Λ/−7Λ\Lambda/\sqrt{-7}\Lambda, and the ball of radius 3 is a tree with 1+8+56+3921+8+56+392 vertices. Γ1\Gamma_1 fixes Λ0\Lambda_0 and permutes its eight neighbours as its reduction permutes the lines of NN: the link of Λ0\Lambda_0 is the sky. The unitary group over Z[1/7]\Z[1/7] acts on T7T_7 with quotient a path [S4][S_4]—[F21][F_{21}]—[PSL⁡(2,7)][\PSL(2,7)], whose vertex groups are the automorphism groups of the standard lattice OE3\mathcal O_E^3, of OL\mathcal O_L and of a lattice L∞L_\infty, with edge groups of orders 3 and 21 and 121=124+1168\tfrac1{21}=\tfrac1{24}+\tfrac1{168}; so it is the amalgam S4∗C3PSL⁡(2,7)S_4*_{C_3}\PSL(2,7), found by Kneser’s method of neighbours. Over Z[1/14]\Z[1/14] it acts on the product of the building Δ2\Delta_2 at 2 and T7T_7 with three orbits of vertices, and at (v0,L∞)(v_0,L_\infty) its stabilizer PSL⁡(2,7)\PSL(2,7) acts on the link at 2 by its plane life and on the link at 7 by its line life.

The orders in the theorem differ for a structural reason. 168⋅73=∣PSL⁡(2,7)∣⋅∣sl(2,F7)∣168\cdot7^3=|\PSL(2,7)|\cdot|\mathfrak{sl}(2,\F_7)|: the kernel on the link is the matrices 1+7X1+7X with tr⁡X≡0\operatorname{tr}X\equiv0, on which PSL⁡(2,7)\PSL(2,7) acts as on sl(2,F7)\mathfrak{sl}(2,\F_7). 168⋅2⋅72=∣SL⁡(2,7)∣⋅∣F72∣168\cdot2\cdot7^2=|\SL(2,7)|\cdot|\F_7^2|: the induced group maps onto Sp(N)=SL⁡(2,7)\mathrm{Sp}(N)=\SL(2,7) with kernel an elementary abelian group of order 727^2. On the link both act as PSL⁡(2,7)\PSL(2,7) on the sky. One sphere further out they differ twice: at the vertex of type 2 the group of the link is covered by SL⁡(2,7)\SL(2,7), whose centre is seen only on the second sphere, and the next layer is a plane over F7\F_7 rather than the three-dimensional Lie algebra.

Theorem(Two completions of the sky) computed

Give TpT_{\mathfrak p} the action of PSL⁡(2,O[1/π])\PSL(2,\mathcal O[1/\pi]) and T7T_7 that of the unitary group over Z[1/14]\Z[1/14], with base vertices whose stabilizers PSL⁡(2,O)\PSL(2,\mathcal O) and Γ1\Gamma_1 act on the two links as PSL⁡(2,7)\PSL(2,7) on the sky.

(1) The two links are incarnations of the object of size 8, which is rigid, so there is exactly one seam between them. (2) Both trees are regular of valence 8, so isomorphisms Tp→T7T_{\mathfrak p}\to T_7 extending that seam exist, and none is distinguished. (3) No such isomorphism carries the local symmetry of one parent to that of the other: on the ball of radius 2 about the base vertex PSL⁡(2,O)\PSL(2,\mathcal O) induces a group of order 168⋅73168\cdot7^3 and Γ1\Gamma_1 one of order 168⋅2⋅72168\cdot2\cdot7^2; and every vertex stabilizer of PSL⁡(2,O[1/π])\PSL(2,\mathcal O[1/\pi]) acts on its link by even permutations, while the stabilizer of L∞L_\infty acts on its link by a group containing PSL⁡(2,7)\PSL(2,7) and odd permutations.

So the bridge “the two parents complete the sky to one tree” is built on the link, a type on the bare trees, and refuted on the trees with their symmetry.

Proof

(1) The stabilizer 7:37{:}3 is self-normalizing. (2) Two trees of the same constant valence are isomorphic by an isomorphism prescribed on one star, built outwards a sphere at a time. (3) PSL⁡(2,O)\PSL(2,\mathcal O) maps onto PSL⁡(2,O/p2)\PSL(2,\mathcal O/\mathfrak p^2) and acts on the second sphere as on P1(Z/49)\Proj^1(\Z/49) with kernel ±1\pm1, a group of order ∣SL⁡(2,Z/49)∣/2|\SL(2,\Z/49)|/2; the group induced by Γ1\Gamma_1 was computed from its generators. An element of SL⁡(2,O[1/π])\SL(2,\mathcal O[1/\pi]) fixing a vertex acts on the link through PSL⁡(2,7)\PSL(2,7), whose permutations of the eight points are even; the stabilizer of L∞L_\infty in Γ1\Gamma_1 induces on its link a group of order 42 containing odd permutations.

Le réseau de KleinKlein’s lattice

at 2: the fano plane of the linka root pair: a flaga pair of norm 3: an antiflagat 7: the conic, the link at 70123456∞inside: a root pairoutside, tangent at ∞ and 2at ∞: klein’s plane21 root pairs: the centresof the involutions sv28 pairs of norm 3: each v⊥a bitangent of the quarticthe same 28 pairs give theantiflags and the sky’s pairs
Plate 9.9One set of pairs read at three places: a root pair and a pair of norm 3 of Klein’s lattice become a flag and an antiflag of the Fano plane at 2, a point inside and a point outside the conic at 7, whose two tangents touch it at a pair of the sky, and at infinity the centre of an involution and a bitangent.

At the vertex (v0,L∞)(v_0,L_\infty) the group of order 168 is the symmetry group of a classical lattice. Call a free OE\mathcal O_E-module of rank 3 with a positive definite hermitian form and a faithful action of G=PSL⁡(2,7)G=\PSL(2,7) by isometries a hermitian lattice for GG. Its complexification is Klein’s representation, whose character takes the value ζ+ζ2+ζ4=α\zeta+\zeta^2+\zeta^4=\alpha on z↦z+1z\mapsto z+1, or its complex conjugate, and the outer automorphism exchanges the two.

Any two hermitian lattices for GG become isometric once one form is multiplied by a positive rational, by an isometry equivariant up to an automorphism of GG, and exactly one is unimodular. The automorphism group of (L∞,h)(L_\infty,h) is {±1}×G0\{\pm1\}\times G_0, with G0≅GG_0\cong G of character values 3,−1,0,1,α,αˉ3,-1,0,1,\alpha,\bar\alpha, so L∞L_\infty is the unimodular one: Klein’s lattice. It is the fractional ideal (1−ζ)−1Z[ζ](1-\zeta)^{-1}\Z[\zeta] of LL with h=tr⁡L/E(xyˉ)h=\operatorname{tr}_{L/E}(x\bar y), isometric to Elkies’ lattice spanned by (2,0,0)(2,0,0), (α,α,0)(\alpha,\alpha,0) and (αˉ,1,1)(\bar\alpha,1,1) with the form 12∑xiyˉi\tfrac12\sum x_i\bar y_i, and it has no vectors of norm 1, 42 of norm 2 and 56 of norm 3. The proof of uniqueness needs only the Klein four-group: at every prime the reduction is irreducible, at 2 because the group acts as all of GL⁡(3,2)\GL(3,2), at an odd prime because on a reducible reduction the perfect group would act through unipotent matrices, its involutions being forced into ±1\pm1; then Nakayama’s lemma and the principal ideals of OE\mathcal O_E make the lattice unique up to a scalar, and Schur’s lemma the form up to a positive rational.

The lattice is classical. Uniqueness follows from Gross, as Elkies records; Allcock and Kato give it with its isometry group PSL⁡(2,7)×{±1}\PSL(2,7)\times\{\pm1\} as the lattice whose group is one of the two densest lattices in PGL⁡3(Q2)\PGL_3(\Q_2); and Nebe identifies it as the Hermitian Barnes lattice, whose trace form is the Barnes lattice P6P_6. That the three incarnations of the object of size 28 below are residues of one set of pairs, with the seams between them as the maps, was not found in the sources consulted.

Theorem(One lattice, three completions) computed

The vectors of norm 2 of L∞L_\infty form 21 pairs ±v\pm v, and those of norm 3 form 28.

(1) In Klein’s plane P(L∞⊗C)\Proj(L_\infty\otimes\C): for vv of norm 2, sv(x)=−x+h(x,v)vs_v(x)=-x+h(x,v)v is an involution in G0G_0 with centre [v][v], and these are its 21 involutions; for vv of norm 3, P(v⊥)\Proj(v^\perp) is a bitangent of the Klein quartic, and these are its 28 bitangents. (2) In the link of v0v_0 at 2, the Fano plane P(L∞/αL∞)\Proj(L_\infty/\alpha L_\infty) whose lines are the orthogonals of the points of P(L∞/αˉL∞)\Proj(L_\infty/\bar\alpha L_\infty): v↦(v mod α,(v mod αˉ)⊥)v\mapsto(v\bmod\alpha,(v\bmod\bar\alpha)^\perp) carries the 21 pairs of norm 2 onto the 21 flags, the triangles of the building at v0v_0, and the 28 pairs of norm 3 onto the 28 antiflags. (3) In L∞/−7L∞L_\infty/\sqrt{-7}L_\infty, whose conic of isotropic points is the link at 7: reduction carries the pairs of norm 2 onto the 21 points inside the conic and those of norm 3 onto the 28 points outside it, hence, through the two tangents, onto the 28 pairs of points of the conic.

All these maps commute with G0G_0. So the bitangents, the antiflags and the pairs of points of the sky are three reductions of one set of 28 pairs of vectors, and the maps between them obtained this way are the seams of the object of size 28.

Proof

(1) Unimodularity puts h(x,v)h(x,v) in OE\mathcal O_E, so svs_v preserves L∞L_\infty; it fixes vv and is −1-1 on v⊥v^\perp, and G0G_0 has 21 involutions. The invariant quartic forms make one line over EE, and on each v⊥v^\perp of norm 3 the quartic is a constant times the square of a binary quadratic form with distinct roots. (2) hh modulo α\alpha pairs L∞/αL∞L_\infty/\alpha L_\infty with L∞/αˉL∞L_\infty/\bar\alpha L_\infty perfectly, and v mod αv\bmod\alpha lies on (v mod αˉ)⊥(v\bmod\bar\alpha)^\perp exactly when h(v,v)∈(α)∩Z=2Zh(v,v)\in(\alpha)\cap\Z=2\Z. (3) The isotropic points are the neighbours at 7, and a point off the conic lies on no tangent or on two. A map between incarnations of a rigid object that commutes with GG is its seam.

Un frère du réseau de MumfordA sibling of Mumford’s lattice

the unitary group of klein’s lattice, 2 invertedvertices: Klein (stabilizer 168) and standard (24)each star: 1 − 14/2 + 21/31χ = (1/168 + 1/24)(1 − 14/2 + 21/3)1/21the sibling: index 168, torsion-freevertices 168/168 + 168/248edges (168/2)(14/168 + 14/24)56triangles (168/3)(21/168 + 21/24)56χ = 8 − 56 + 568torsion-free subgroups, 2 and 7 invertedtree at 7: 1 − 8/2−3χ/[U : Γ] = (1/21 + 1/24 + 1/168)(1)(−3)−2/7slice at 7: vertices 7 + 8 + 116edges 168/3 + 168/2164a free group of rank 64 − 16 + 149open: a torsion-free subgroup of index 168 over Z[1/14]
Plate 9.10The masses that count the sibling, computed: U∞\mathbf U_\infty has Euler characteristic (1168+124)(1−7+7)=121(\tfrac1{168}+\tfrac1{24})(1-7+7)=\tfrac1{21}; ΓK\Gamma_K, of index 168, leaves 8 vertices, 56 edges and 56 triangles; over Z[1/14]\Z[1/14] a torsion-free subgroup has Euler characteristic −27-\tfrac27 per unit of index, and its slice at 7 is free of rank 64−16+1=4964-16+1=49.

Mumford’s lattice is a torsion-free subgroup of Γ1=U[1/2]\Gamma_1=\mathbf U[1/2] acting simply transitively on the vertices of Δ2\Delta_2, cut out by reduction at −7\sqrt{-7}, and Γ1\Gamma_1 is the stabilizer of the vertex Λ0\Lambda_0 of T7T_7, of type 2. The same can be asked at a self-dual vertex. A vertex (v,Λ)(v,\Lambda) of Δ2×T7\Delta_2\times T_7 with Λ\Lambda self-dual determines a unimodular lattice, Λ\Lambda at 7, of the class vv at (α)(\alpha), its dual at (αˉ)(\bar\alpha) and OL\mathcal O_L elsewhere; call the vertex standard or Klein according as that lattice is isometric to OE3\mathcal O_E^3 or to L∞L_\infty. These are the two orbits of self-dual vertices, with stabilizers S4S_4 and G0G_0. Let U∞\mathbf U_\infty be the stabilizer of Λ∞=L∞⊗O7\Lambda_\infty=L_\infty\otimes\mathcal O_7 in U=U[1/14]\mathbf U=\mathbf U[1/14]: the unitary group of L∞L_\infty over OE[1/2]\mathcal O_E[1/2], modulo its centre, and for each standard vertex ww next to v0v_0 let gw∈U∞g_w\in\mathbf U_\infty carry v0v_0 to the other Klein neighbour of ww.

Parts (1) and (2) are due to Allcock and Kato; part (3) was not found in their papers. Since every gwg_w acts at 7 by an odd permutation, the Klein vertices of Δ2\Delta_2 fall into two classes, and two Klein vertices at distance 2 always lie in different classes. This parity is not a property of Δ2\Delta_2, whose vertices carry only their types; it is read off at 7. The sibling uses the reduction at −7\sqrt{-7} as Mumford’s lattice does, with an outer involution in place of a Sylow 2-subgroup.

Over Z[1/14]\Z[1/14] there is no reduction at −7\sqrt{-7}. Every torsion-free subgroup Γ\Gamma of finite index in U\mathbf U has index divisible by 168 and Euler characteristic −27[U:Γ]-\tfrac27[\mathbf U:\Gamma]. None acts simply transitively on the vertices of type 2 or on the standard ones. One acts simply transitively on the Klein vertices exactly when its index is 168, and then it meets U[1/7]≅S4∗C3PSL⁡(2,7)\mathbf U[1/7]\cong S_4*_{C_3}\PSL(2,7) in a free group of rank 49; one containing the kernel of reduction modulo 3 has index divisible by 672. The two slices exist separately: ΓK\Gamma_K in U∞\mathbf U_\infty, and at 7 free subgroups of U[1/7]\mathbf U[1/7] of index 168 and rank 49 acting simply transitively on its Klein vertices, built from an action on 168 points of PSL⁡(2,7)\PSL(2,7) and of S4S_4 that agree on C3C_3. Whether the slices glue, that is, whether U[1/14]\mathbf U[1/14] has a torsion-free subgroup of index 168, is open. Such a subgroup cannot contain the kernel of reduction modulo 3, and the slice ΓK\Gamma_K is cut out by reduction at −7\sqrt{-7}, which U[1/14]\mathbf U[1/14] does not have.

Theorem(A sibling of Mumford’s lattice at Klein’s lattice) computed

(1) U∞\mathbf U_\infty acts on Δ2\Delta_2 with two orbits of vertices, Klein (stabilizer PSL⁡(2,7)\PSL(2,7)) and standard (stabilizer S4S_4). No two Klein vertices are adjacent, and each standard vertex has exactly two Klein neighbours, one in its link as a point and one as a line. The Euler characteristic of U∞\mathbf U_\infty is 121\tfrac1{21}.

(2) U∞\mathbf U_\infty acts on the eight neighbours of Λ∞\Lambda_\infty in T7T_7 through a surjection φ ⁣:U∞→PGL⁡(2,7)\varphi\colon\mathbf U_\infty\to\PGL(2,7) with φ(G0)=PSL⁡(2,7)\varphi(G_0)=\PSL(2,7), and every gwg_w acts by an odd permutation.

(3) For an involution τ∈PGL⁡(2,7)\tau\in\PGL(2,7) outside PSL⁡(2,7)\PSL(2,7), ΓK=φ−1{1,τ}\Gamma_K=\varphi^{-1}\{1,\tau\} is a torsion-free subgroup of index 168 that acts simply transitively on the Klein vertices of Δ2\Delta_2 and freely on the standard ones, with 7 orbits. The quotient Δ2/ΓK\Delta_2/\Gamma_K has 8 vertices, 56 edges and 56 triangles, and Euler characteristic 8.

Proof

(1) The fourteen neighbours of L∞L_\infty at (α)(\alpha) have orthonormal bases, and each has exactly two Klein neighbours; χ=(1168+124)(1−142+213)=121\chi=(\tfrac1{168}+\tfrac1{24})(1-\tfrac{14}2+\tfrac{21}3)=\tfrac1{21}. (2) The image on the link has order at most 336; G0G_0 acts by the even permutations of a copy of PSL⁡(2,7)\PSL(2,7) and each gwg_w by an odd one, and the centralizer of that copy is trivial, so the group embeds in Aut⁡PSL⁡(2,7)\Aut\PSL(2,7) and is PGL⁡(2,7)\PGL(2,7). (3) φ(G0){1,τ}=PGL⁡(2,7)\varphi(G_0)\{1,\tau\}=\PGL(2,7) gives the index. An element of finite order fixes a point of the building, a complete CAT(0)\mathrm{CAT}(0) space, so it lies in a conjugate of G0G_0 or S4S_4, which act by even permutations, or its cube does; so it lies in ker⁡φ\ker\varphi, which is torsion-free by the binomial argument at −7\sqrt{-7}. The cells are counted as in (1).

The chapter leaves the group of order 168 at three places, with two arithmetic parents that share the finite line and part one step out. What it hands on is Klein’s lattice. The next chapter reads the whole seam table from it: every object a datum of the lattice, and almost every seam a composite of its residues at 2, 7 and infinity.

Whether the two slices of a sibling of Mumford’s lattice glue over Z[1/14]\Z[1/14] stays open. The vertex groups met here, {±1}×PSL⁡(2,7)\{\pm1\}\times\PSL(2,7), {±1}×S4\{\pm1\}\times S_4 and {±1}×7:3\{\pm1\}\times7{:}3, are automorphism groups of lattices whose masses the formula of Smith, Minkowski and Siegel computes place by place; that reading is the chantier of chapter 19.

Introduced here
completion