bridge
Floor 3, Ce qui est su · introduced in Chapter 1, Un objet, plusieurs noms
What exactly is claimed when two theories are said to name the same thing?
The assertion that two sets, given in two theories, are incarnations of one object; only a built bridge is a theorem.
A bridge is the assertion that two sets, given in two theories, are incarnations of one object. Its status records what is known about it: built, type, name or refuted. A bridge is an assertion with a status, and only a built bridge is a theorem.
For two marked sets of one group, the stabilizer principle decides every type bridge. Either the stabilizer classes agree, and then is a seam for any pair of points with , so the bridge is built as soon as one such pair is exhibited; or they differ, no seam exists, and the bridge is refuted. The second outcome marks a cell of the atlas that is empty by necessity.
Number the imaginary units of the octonions , , so that , and identify the plane of this table with the Fano plane, the unit lines being its points. For a doubly even binary code of length 8 and dimension 4, is a copy of .
(a) There are 30 such codes, in bijection with the 30 Fano planes on the seven units. (b) Exactly seven of the 30 lattices are closed under multiplication: those whose Fano plane shares exactly three lines with the plane of the table, and those three lines pass through one unit . (c) The collineations of the table permute the 30 lattices in orbits of sizes 1, 7, 14 and 8, with stabilizer classes , , and ; the lattice of the orbit of size 1 is not closed. (d) The stabilizer of each closed lattice fixes exactly one unit, the of (b).
So the seven closed lattices, Coxeter’s octavian orders, are an incarnation of the object of the points, and is its seam to the unit lines: the bridge between an octavian order and a point of the Fano plane is built. The invariant lattice is the one Kirmse proposed, and it is not closed under multiplication.
Where less is shared, less is claimed. The octonion multiplication table and the triangle presentation of the octonion completion have the same set of oriented triples, so the bridge between them is built for those triples and nothing more is identified: is not a homomorphism, since while .
In the octonions of the cyclic table let , so that , let , and let . (1) The derivations killing are those commuting with left multiplication by , and they act on the complement of , a complex 3-space, as ; the same holds for . (2) The two copies of meet in a copy of and together generate . (3) The automorphism group is transitive on the unit imaginary octonions, so the stabilizers of and of are conjugate in ; but no element of the stabilizer of carries to . (4) The 21 permutations , , are automorphisms fixing , and three of them fix .
So and are two points of one object of , the sphere , and seams of -sets join them, while for they are not joined: fixes , and its orbit through has dimension 5. The bridge between the two units is built for and refuted for . The status of a bridge depends on the group in which seams are sought.
(1), (2) and (4) by computation. (3) The orbit of under has dimension , so it is open in the sphere ; it is compact, hence closed, and is connected. The elements of preserve , which is not .
- Built from
- incarnationseam
- In the Esquisse
- 2L’espace en creux3La table des sutures du groupe d’ordre 1684La monodromie des sutures8La famille de Weyl9Immeubles et réseaux10La table en deux, en sept et à l’infini11Le revêtement double et le miroir14Les continus17L’écart de Galois
- The volume’s word
- clock
- In the volume
- IThe Founding SentenceVIIThe Branchial TreeVIIISpace as a TallyXThe Finite Celestial SphereXIIThe Coxeter GraphXIIIThe Level-Seven ShadowXIVWhy OctonionsXVSpin from the Double CoverXVIIITwo Parents of the SkyXXThe Commuting SquaresXXIVA Number Nature Could RefuteEp.Forcing, Not Sacred Geometry